« Remote work a good idea? I say no. | Main | Justice O'Connor retires »

June 30, 2005

Comments

Good post. I'm not sure if you're saying that the space program is a bad idea, or just the shuttle. If it's the shuttle, I agree. It is a bad idea and it's holding NASA back. It's really not doing anything and keeping NASA from pushing the future by making them maintain the past. Finish the ISS, then ease it out, replace it with something better or invest in something different.

If you're railing against space research then you're on the wrong boat, there are few frontiers as promising as that one. Not to mention the realized commercial values of satellites, there's also the just budding space tourism , and the endless military applications. But those are all practical, or profitable realized applications where NASA does not belong. NASA belongs out on a limb, pursuing the fringe technologies toward which no profit driven business in their right mind would pay more than lip service, like space elevators, missions to other planets, or space solar arrays that can power us back down on earth. That's why the government's doing it. So far as research is concerned, the gov. opens up the frontier, the business's exploit it and make it useful.

Keep in mind that the Egyptians had no concept of anything beyond that pyramid (which also had no practical use). We do. It was a nice metaphor, but inappropriate.

To say that we, who little more than a hundred years ago just left the ground, have plateaued in our endeavors on the latest frontier, is to renounce the spirit that got us here in the first place.

Years ago two competing groups within NASA fought for its future -- one wanted to build a space station on the moon which could be used as a launching point to explore space. The other wanted a taxi service. The taxi service guys won and mankind's dreams of space exploration died at that moment.

The comments to this entry are closed.