« IT: not cool; government not cool either | Main | Anti-smoking laws and economics »

August 18, 2005

Comments

Why do people still cling to outdated Marxist notions such as "class" in a country where nothing prevents those with less money than average working harder and smarter and gaining more money than average? And nothing protects rich spoiled kids from squandering money earned by their parents. It's a fluid system, and trying to jury-rig concepts like class onto it is an injustice to a free society and to the people who violate the structures of class every day.

I agree. Class structures might explain some things, but as a whole, it doesn't seem to be very meaningful when people are struggling to make the data fit the class system.

First, you should be careful making conclusions based upon two data points (Washington, DC, and New York). My guess is one aspect is that government workers live in the suburbs (the middle class) while those in hip companies in NYC probably actually live in Manhatten. The rich eat later because they probably commute shorter distances than the middle class.

Second, eating time is probably as much an aspect of age than class. 20-somethings probably have a different time schedule than 50 somethings.

Third, it could be explained in race as well as class.

The comments to this entry are closed.