Through some sort of amazing coincidence, it looks like New Orleans is in the possible path of hurricane Rita, which is predicted to become a major hurricane of at least category 4 before it makes landfall.
I'm hoping it scores a direct hit on New Orleans. Am I sadistic? Not at all. First of all, most of New Orleans is already destroyed, so what more damage can another hurricane do? At least everyone is already evacuated.
I am mad that Bush wants to throw $200 billion into rebuilding New Orleans when it's still below sea level in the middle of an active hurricane region. It's only a matter of time before New Orleans takes another hit and then we need to spend yet another $200 billion.
How many times does New Orleans need to be destroyed before we figure out that it's built in a dumb spot? Apparently more than once, but maybe its second destruction in a few days will do the trick. Rita could wind up being the only hurricane to ever actually save the taxpayer money.
Hi Half Sigma
I have to agree, New Orleans would be the ideal spot for another natural disaster since it really cannot be hurt more than it already has and the people are evacuated.
A century ago, a major hurricane destroyed Galveston and end up making Houston the major city in Texas. I wonder if Katrina will do the same for Baton Rouge.
Posted by: Michael H. | September 20, 2005 at 08:51 AM
I would have no problem with them moving the nation's capital and the primary IRS building to New Orleans.
Posted by: Scott S | September 20, 2005 at 04:20 PM
Unfortunately, it also is by far the best place in the nation to put a seaport. It is also close to most of our oil fields.
New Orleans has been destroyed before. Actually worse than Katrina. THats what lead to Herbert Hoover become president, and totally and permanently changed the federal state dynamic. Indirectly, it even lead to the civil rights movement.
It isn't all that problematical, really. Next time we rebuild NOLA, we need to make it hurricane proof. We know how, theres 30 million feet of new landfillalready there, and a nice big river to float landfill down from wnywhere in the middle third of the US
why don't we just raise the land considerably above sea level. We only need about 30 feet or so. Its not as if we have to accomodate a large population any more.
Posted by: Randy Gordon | September 21, 2005 at 05:32 PM
I hope Rita makes a nice big turn and smashes New Orleans into bits. I don't want my taxpayer money going towards rebuilding a city that is mostly made up of poverty, poor education, and crime. DEATH TO NEW ORLEANS
Posted by: Ruiner | September 22, 2005 at 05:13 PM
I don't agree with Bush's policy about rebuilding, either, and I live in the area. Not in New Orleans though; why anyone would intentionally live below sea level baffles me. I understand having a port there, but really, the design of the city is awful. It also had a lot of high crime -- another reason stuffing people into the Superdome was a stupid idea to begin with -- and the mayor is an inept, corrupt whiner.
Bush should propose the federal government rebuild highways, and let the states deal with the rest. Stick the remainder of the $200B into the debt. (Sorry to reply so late to a post; just found this site.)
Posted by: Adam | October 10, 2005 at 05:06 PM