« The real political story of America | Main | "Leftist" vs. "liberal" »

June 27, 2006

Comments

Geoengineering seems more promising to me that reducing fossile fuel consumption but much less promising than improving nuclear or solar to the point that they are cheaper than coal could ever be and developing really good batteries. Both of those options seem achievable within a decade with serious effort.

Geoengineering seems like default a terrible idea.

There are finite limits to how many roofs we can paint white and how much algea we can grow without screwing up the ecosystem.

Start watching for headlines that are more optimistic, such as these:

GLOBAL WARMING REVERSED!
DIASTER AVERTED... EARTH SAVED!
MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGES... PERMANENTLY NULLIFIED!

Albert Einstein provided the perfect scientific answer to Global Warming in 1905 with his paradigm, mass-to-energy equation, which is the key to unlocking all of the clean, cheap, environmentally friendly energy the inhabitants of Earth will ever need, without any pollution or waste stream, and with no carbon dioxide or other greenhouse emissions.

Even the super-powerful Energy Cartel will be unable to prevent millions of individuals around the World from freely switching to this abundant and everlasting Einsteinian cornucopia of "home-made energy," which will automatically reestablish Mother Nature as the exclusive controller of climate change.

http://slow-motion-Thermonuclear.blogspot.com/2006/06/invention-for-sale-slow-motion.html


The comments to this entry are closed.