« Rich people love Obama | Main | Inside the law school scam »

August 21, 2011

Comments

I don't know, but I have a sad sinking feeling that the country is going to see a huge dip in quality of life soon..

Islam is going to Conquer the World, we're doomed!

People may be celebrating the demise of Qadaffi a little too soon.

This is not the first time.

Indeed, the situation is pretty messy still. And it will only get worse after Qadaffi's demise. Unless another dictator comes in power, Thousand tribes of Libya won't rest.

"What's going on in Libya?" Either the tinpot despot is going to be replaced by a different tinpot despot, or he ain't.

I hope they get a democracy, because apparently a democracy brings freedom and cures all ills. Just look at South Africa.
Score another victory for the Bush/Obama neocon foreign policy!

His days are numbered!

Libya was to Southern Europe a kind of Cuba, North Korea, and Mexico (as an African immigration conduit) all rolled into one with the added spice of plenty of Al Qaeda types in the East and the additional complication of their dependency on its oil exports. They've been waiting decades for such an opportunity, and they took it.

Off topic, but have you commented yet on uproar that surrounding the formerly anonymous blog by a first-tier law professor called "Inside the Law School Scam?"

http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot.com/

The vitriolic ad hominem's of the despicable Brian Leiter are especially entertaining.

http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2011/08/update-on-scamprof.html

[HS: Has the blogger been outed? Because I got the impression that the blogger was a law student pretending to be a law professor.]

Qaddafi has the cash that any country will take him him. I'll bet he goes to Saudi Arabia, Central Africa, or one of those small Asian countries like Singapore/Brunei.

His name is Paul Campos and teaches at U of Colorado.

Leiter hinted that he knew who he was, but it was Campos who outed himself.

Obama has been working hard to overthrow all the (relatively) pro-Western Muslim dictators and leaving the anti-American dictators in place.

The Libyan people crazier than Gadhaffi is and they'll vote in somebody worse.

Muslim democracies are a greater danger than Muslim dictators because at least the dictators can be bribed with suitcases filled with cash, hookers, drugs, and Swiss bank accounts.

Muslim civilians are the terrorists, the Mubaraks, Pahlavis and Gadhaffis are the good guys.

"Islam is going to Conquer the World, we're doomed!

Posted by: Peter | August 22, 2011 at 12:50 AM"

While Islam isn't capable of conquering the world (because they're either too low IQ and/or too savage and disorganized to build high tech weapons and armies like Nazi era Germans were) they are many things they could do to cause disruptions for the first world like blowing up luxury hotels (the Bombay hotel attack), fly planes into skyscrapers, or open fire on oil tankers to raise Western oil prices.

The Caliphate isn't coming back because the Muslims are unable to create the modern equivalent of panzer divisions, but that doesn't mean they can't create a considerable amount of trouble for Western countries via low(ish) levels of Muslim terrorist violence.

"People may be celebrating the demise of Qadaffi a little too soon."

Hamas is celebrating the arrival of Libyan democracy because Hamas knows the Libyan people are crazier and more genocidal than Gadhaffi and will therefore vote for Muslim terrorist parties, just like Mubarak free Egypt will unless the Egyptian military crushes democracy.

http://blogs.aljazeera.net/liveblog/libya-aug-22-2011-0244

Monday, August 22, 2011 - 00:44 - Libya

Hamas welcomes the revolution freeing Tripoli and congratulates Libyans on the great victory they have achieved, Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesman for Hamas, said in a short statement to the press on Monday.

Hamas wishes that this victory is a turning point in the history of the Libyan towards freedom and prosperity, Abu Zuhri added.

The new Libyan constitution makes Sharia the supreme law of Libya.

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/22/libyan-draft-constitution-sharia-is-principal-source-of-legislation/

But despite the Lockean tenor of much of the constitution, the inescapable clause lies right in Part 1, Article 1: “Islam is the Religion of the State, and the principal source of legislation is Islamic Jurisprudence (Sharia).” Under this constitution, in other words, Islam is law.

Btw, how many billions are we going to spend on foreign aid to the new, Switzerland-like Libya?

Thinking about corporate globalism rising at the expense of wages -- with no corresponding drop in the cost of reproduction -- and the coopting of collective barganing (AFL/CIO is a joke), it occurred to me that Islam may be positioned to do what the Unions and the Commies were never in a position to do: Conduct effective collective bargaining on a global scale with force to counter the corporate "strike busters" and international "scabs".

One of the things that the labor movements of the 20th century taught is that effective collective bargaining elicited force and fraud from the government-corporate axis, and that unions had to be able to respond with force and fraud.

All of this produced an environment of corrupt government and organized crime, that eventually merged to form the current regime called the United States.

Communists said that they could organize international labor pools in a similar manner but they never really had to since immigration wasn't that much of a factor in labor disputes until after communism had been largely discredited. However, now we see that immigration is a huge factor in depressing wages below levels requried for reproductively viable families, and the result is both demographic collapse and corporate imperialism.

Islam, through its international, universalist language, decentralized command structure (union locals being replaced by mosques) may be able to deliver on the rhetoric of the communists in an era where international collective bargaining and meeting organized criminal corporate action with criminal labor action is necessary.

No, I'm not enthusiastic about the Islamization of the West. But the corporate assholes will not respect the sovereignty of the countries that made them viable so they are effectively creating the situation for it.

The Muslims violent, low-IQ behavior may be due to extensive levels of inbreeding. I've noticed that Muslim immigrants have low, slopping forheads, frequently walk around with their mouths slacked open, like some inbred hillbillies in West Virginia:

The Keystone of the Islamic Milieu: Inbreeding

By Ann Barnhardt

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/the_keystone_of_the_islamic_mi.html

Everywhere in the western world, people look at the savage violence that is a daily occurrence in the Muslim world and shake their heads in stunned disbelief. A pastor of a very small Christian flock in Florida burns a Koran. Weeks later at literally the global antipode, Muslim imams drive through neighborhoods in a vehicle with loudspeakers attached, calling the townsfolk to riot. The townsfolk respond, and before it is all over, at least 22 innocent people are dead at the hands of these townsfolk, with at least two of them beheaded. How is this possible? How can this be? How can human behavior and culture be so monstrously different? Is this difference attributable to nothing more than environmental nurture theory?

No. There is something else. There is a catalyst -- absent in every other culture on earth -- that has poisoned the cultural soil, thus yielding the fruit of bad harvest for nearly 1,400 years. That catalyst is inbreeding. As a direct result, the Muslim population is mentally developmentally disabled on a mass scale.

snip

As a Roman Catholic, I attribute this to what is called "The Natural Law." Every human person without exception is created by God with a deep, innate knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong. Stabbing someone in the neck for no reason whatsoever is just as wrong here in Lone Tree, Colorado as it is in the Amazon basin, as it is on the high plateaus of Mongolia.

But there is one culture, one faux "religion," that expressly condones and encourages consanguineous marriage and breeding. That system is Islam, and the document that explicitly ratifies incest is the Koran, specifically Sura 4 verse 23:

"Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated the marriage -- if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time -- but do not break up existing marriages."

Sounds like an exhaustive list -- but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed. In the Muslim culture, marriage and breeding between first cousins has existed since day one. Mohammed himself married Zaynab, who was his father's sister's daughter. Mohammed and Zaynab were direct first cousins.

Marrying your first cousin is the genetic equivalent of marrying your half-sibling.

The Reproductive Health Journal reports the following rates on consanguinity in Muslim countries. Where a statistical range has been recorded, I have used the lower parameter:

Algeria: 22.6%
Bahrain: 39.4%
Egypt (North): 20.9%
Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%
Iraq: 47.0%
Jordan: 28.5%
Kuwait: 22.5%
Lebanon: 12.8%
Libya: 48.4%
Mauritania: 47.2%
Morocco: 19.9%
Oman: 56.3%
Palestine: 17.5%
Qatar: 54.0%
Saudi Arabia: 42.1%
Sudan: 44.2%
Syria: 30.3%
Tunisia: 20.1%
United Arab Emirates: 40.0%
Yemen: 40.0%

Muslim men are never, ever allowed to be around, see, converse with or otherwise interact with any females outside of their families. However, they are permitted to act as chaperones for their female first cousins. If your first cousin is the only person of the opposite sex you ever get to interact with, is it any surprise that Muslims are marrying their first cousins more as the rule than as the exception?

According to the BBC, 55% of Pakistani-Britons are married to a first cousin, and as a corollary to that produce "just under a third" of all children in the UK with genetic illnesses, despite being only 3% of the total births.

As a direct result of inbreeding, the Muslim population is the only population on earth that is mentally and physically devolving.

"While Islam isn't capable of conquering the world (because they're either too low IQ and/or too savage and disorganized to build high tech weapons and armies like Nazi era Germans were)"

"The Caliphate isn't coming back because the Muslims are unable to create the modern equivalent of panzer divisions"

Islam may blind-side the West.

Many Euro males, fed up with the Western elites and what they’ve done to him and his societies, may eventually defect to Islam as something comparatively better, and thus replenish Islam, provide it with the techno capacity and creativity of Euroman, and make it even more potent. Or the Western ethnic elites, having foolishly and with great hubris immiserated Euroman and thus the very source of their strength and advantage, Euroman’s creativity, may lose to Islam due to Islam’s advantages in other, more traditional ways and modes (i.e. patriarchy, breeding, discipline, violence, zeal, etc.) aside from creativity or technical ability. Euroman is genetically far more adapted to individualism than to civilization so when wealth is centralized away from “the middle class”—a euphemism for stable nuclear families capable of reproducing themselves from generation to generation—it undercuts the lifeforce of Euroman from which his creativity flows.

As for Islam’s probable mode of technologically blind-siding Western elites, all it takes to get the engineers away from their video games and Fox news propaganda is throwing women at them. Like all mideastern religions, Islam is morally nimble enough to pull off all kinds of magic in this regard. It's hard for me to second guess how they would pick up this incredibly valuable discarded resource, but it is almost inconceivable to me that the imams would fail to do so, it is such a low-hanging fruit for them. They don’t have the handicap that the current Western elites or their subcon (i.e. east Indian) allies suffer in this regard: niche competition. The current Western elites and subcons have to convince themselves that the reason they are displacing Euroman in technology is because Euroman is inferior. To any objective observer, that is obviously not true and the imams don’t have a dog in this fight.

It is certainly true that the Euromen enslaved to Islam would be far less effective than they would be under a different system, such as collecting all economic rents and distributing them evenly to all citizens with strict border controls). But the current regime enslaving Euroman is so pathological that you don’t need much freedom to get profound returns on the resources you invest in them.

The pictures of the rebels firing their Kalashnikovs look pretty comical. Do they think its all a video game or something? Either they meet no resistance and they are simply wasting ammo all the time or their opponents are as stupid as them. A well-trained company or two would take these punks off the streets in no time.

WOOO HOOOOOO

How soon will Lara Logan show up wearing a cute lil V-neck to party down with the natives?

I agree with the comment by the 'undiscovered jew'. I've long been confused with why the US is helping these rebels overthrow the dictators. The Moslem Brotherhood is the only organized group in most of these countries. So they'll be the ones who take over. I'd rather the dictators be in charge. Some countries just need a good dictator. If the 3rd worldization of America continues then we'll need a good dictator, too.

"Many Euro males, fed up with the Western elites and what they’ve done to him and his societies, may eventually defect to Islam"

I know many young white guys. They're not converting to Islam anytime soon (at least not willingly) because you Islam is stupid, even compared to the other major world religions.

Embracing Islam means no more alcohol, no premarital sex not involving young boys, arranged marriages with cousins, and requiring all beautiful women to wear garbage bags over their heads instead of skimpy outfits.

Islam is so repulsive and stupid to anyone either not born into the religion or forcibly converted into it that not even SWPL liberals are willing to convert to Islam.

And SWPLs, despite often claiming to be atheists/agnostics, love to convert to any form Oriental religions such as bastardized forms Hinduist vegetarianism, Buddhism, Kaballah, and other mystical nonsense.

Islam is the only Eastern religion SWPLs won't convert to, which just proves how utterly stupid Islam is.

The much-lauded liberation of female "choice" -- choice in sexual partners, reproductive choice, career choice, "lifestyle" choice, choice of social support services from the government -- over the last generation is now a fixture of Western civilization.

The moral force behind this female empowerment is the extent to which it represents returning to individual females their sovereignty.

What about male individual sovereignty?

Under natural law the ultimate power -- the power that shapes the future -- of female individual sovereignty is the choice of which genes make it into the next generation and that power is exercised through birth.

Under natural law the ultimate power of male individual sovereignty is the choice of that which is to be killed in single combat.

Civilization is founded on a meta-stable "deal" in which females give up their individual sovereignty to their mates and their mates give up their individual sovereignty to the State. If, in this scenario, you liberate only one sex, not only does civilization collapse, but until it does, the circumstances are unbearable to the sex not liberated.

In Western civilization there is no going back to the age of females giving up their individual sovereignty to their mates, so Western civilization is ending and we are left with two choices:

Figure out how to legitimize formal individual combat to the death between males, or adopt Islam.

That's a true dilemma.

The quality of life and security for the citizens has been largely restored and we are a large part of why that has happened.

The comments to this entry are closed.