« Andrew Breitbart’s mysterious death | Main | Japanese health problem: too skinny »

March 02, 2012

Comments

Without buying into this theory, it should be noted that this administration has repeatedly flouted the law and ignored the Constitution. What exactly is the line that they won't cross? Who knows.

Here's my prediction as to what the autopsy will show:

1. Atherosoclerotic coronary arteries, maybe with some associated myocardial injury.

2. Drug screen positive for alcohol and maybe other stuff.

3. Maybe evidence of alcoholic liver injury.

And you're not a nobody to us regular readers, HS. We love you!

Breitbart is not the first example of conspiracy theories about the death of obama's enemies:

http://www.amazon.ca/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine/dp/0578013878

But I would be far more suspicous of other presidents than I am of Obama. Obama didn't need to be a psychopath to get to the top because he could use his brains instead (magna at harvard law). I think Obama is the most ethical man to occupy the white house since Carter as evidenced by obama's opposition to the Iraq war and refusal to invade Iran.

I think they killed him, but not the way you think. Liberalism is insane. Yes, literally, insane. It is based preposterous, idiotic ideas asserted with anger, cruelty and contempt. You are expected obey, and believe or at least shut up.

If you are an intelligent person interested in the truth, a massive cognitive dissonance is aroused. We supposedly live in a free country, where issues are open to debate. But serious disagreement is harshly put down.

It's easy to get wrapped up with fighting this. Breitbart went all in, and the stress killed him. I'm guessing his health and constitution weren't that great, but otherwise he might have lived to be 60 or so.

We need 10 more Andrew Breitbarts.

What's the holdup on those videos? I hope they don't disappear.

Breitbart was not a "regular conservative", he was talking about the frankfurt school and cultural marxism. Regular conservatives haven't even heard of those things. And he specifically said he was going to release videos of obama and terrorists bill ayers and dohrn speaking together about helter skelter... I think it's not at all a reach to suggest foul play.

When we become a third world country, will the Cubs win?

Ok, let's assume that Obamma thinks that offing journalists is acceptable because he spent his formative years in Indonesia.
So he calls in his Chief of Staff and asks him to 'take care of that Breitbart guy'. The Chief of Staff then has to be ok with this. The CoS then has to find someone willing to do it (does the white house have a rolodex of assassins?), but it has to look like it wasn't an assassination (is this something that assassins keep in a portfolio?).
If they don't hire an independent contractor, this means that they have to find someone in intelligence that is ok with killing a private US citizen who hasn't broken any laws. How do you broach this conversation?

Sorry, but this line of reasoning is just too much. Breitbart's death was, in no way, caused by his political enemies.

"But our president spent many years of his childhood in a third-world Muslim nation and surely picked up some alien values in the process. And the United States is becoming more like a third world nation every day as massive immigration from third-world countries continues unabated."

---

Don't forget the Chicago/Israeli Kosher crew that surrounds him. But I don't think you'd be as interested in investigating that particular angle.

Maybe someone will selectively edit Breitbart's obituary to make him look like a decent human being.

I bet people dressed up in pimp outfits will crash his funeral.

Was there anything Breitbart could actually say or do to damage Obama in the eyes of his supporters? If anyone wants to believe Obama's a third world communist dictator tyrant whatever, there's plenty of "evidence" out there online and in the world of vanity publishing.

Obama won decisively in 2008 despite all the Ayers/Wright stuff. I don't see how some grainy footage of Obama in his 20s using leftist rhetoric would have been that much more damaging. Joe and Jane American aren't exactly "on the fence" about the man at this point.

People who are inclined to become politicians generally carry themselves in a moderate, measured way their whole life, regardless of what they actually believe inside, because they know that's the best way to fulfil their ambitions. The idea that any evidence, video or otherwise, will ever surface showing Obama to be the radical Marxist the professional right is convinced he is seems about as likely as a video of Romeny embracing HBD.

I bet people dressed up in pimp outfits will crash his funeral.

Posted by: Conquistador | March 02, 2012 at 03:10 PM


Lol. Someone make this happen. Please.

...
When did this become a conspiracy theory blog?

Jay - it's not the supporters, it's the swing voters. If the Ayers/Wright stuff were better known in 2008, some people who were wobbling whether to vote for McCain or Obama would have wobbled to McCain. There's also a turnout effect - someone who wouldn't consider voting for McCain might have had their enthusiasm reduced enough that they didn't make it to the polls because it was raining, or they had the opportunity for overtime that day, etc. - meanwhile, someone who wouldn't have considered voting for Obama but didn't care much about McCain might have been outraged enough to make sure they *did* get out to vote for McCain.

So whatever "bombshell" Breitbart had, the impact isn't whether the Obama true believers would be affected, it's whether someone who's not a strong Obama supporter will get turned off enough to not vote for Obama, even if he won't actually vote for Romney.

"I think Obama is the most ethical man to occupy the white house since Carter as evidenced by obama's opposition to the Iraq war and refusal to invade Iran."

Bwahahaha -- is this a joke?

He opposed the eeeeevil wars of Dubya Bush so much that he continued fighting them, and even escalated them, and meanwhile massively increased the tempo of drone strikes in Pakistan and started a new war in Libya.

As for the ethics of Jimmy Carter - this is the guy who gave Saddam a green light to attack Iran, and also needlessly endangered the lives of the hostages in Iran by launching a rescue mission because his poll numbers were dropping.

"Obama didn't need to be a psychopath to get to the top because he could use his brains instead"

There are lots of smart psychopaths - they're the most dangerous kind. And that's disregarding the whole affirmative action thing.

Was there anything Breitbart could actually say or do to damage Obama in the eyes of his supporters?

No, but videos showing him spouting off far leftist rhetoric could damage his support from a large number of relatively fickle white independents, especially those foolish enough to think that he's still some sort of moderate democrat. The term "liberal" is still an automatic turnoff to a large number of moderate independents, many of whom voted for Obama in 2008 but who could easily turn towards Romney.

But yes, his core NAM and lefist support coalition would still vote for him regardless of any tapes that Breitbart could provide.

How can Half Sigma call himself a nobody when his blog has been cited by the New York beta times on several occasions? His previous blog "Calico Cat" was also making some waves a few years ago. Compared to most bloggers our humble narrator is far from irrelevant.

His Fresh Direct deliveryman was actually a CIA operative who assassinated him under Obama's orders.

On a serious note I will say that I may not agree with everything HS says, and will not pretend that everything he says lacks credibility due to his global warming denial, and even respect him on his not very politically correct HBD views. However, to say that Breitbart was assassinated is ludicrous.

I do strongly disagree with the egregious sentiments regarding how people should celebrate Breitbart's death. I didn't agree with his political stance, but he at least had the right to life.

[HS: I didn't say that Breitbart was assassinated.]

"As for the ethics of Jimmy Carter - this is the guy who gave Saddam a green light to attack Iran". - JP


I admire Jimmy Carter even more now but we didn't even have bases in the region at the time. I doubt our approval meant much to Saddam. He could have won that war too were it not for his ineptitude. Although I doubt much would have changed regionally. Instead of mullahs Saddam's inner clique would be in possession of atomic weaponry. A resurgent Babylon vs resurgent Persia. Pick your poison America/Israel/Europe.

"He opposed the eeeeevil wars of Dubya Bush" - JP

He only really opposed the Iraq war. As for his hypocrisy on executive power grabs well that's like the GOP warning about black helicopter raids by Clinton's police/military thugs only then to preside over the largest expansion of executive power in modern history. Now they've reverted back to the dictator talk as evidenced by your own belief that Obama "disregards the Constitution".

I guess Obama doesn't know about Gandhi's views on blacks.

I'm trying not to sound like a conspiracy nut, nor do I even remotely imagine that Obama would order Breibart knocked off, but it *is* very, very unusual for a 43-year-old with no history of bad health to just drop dead like that.

"And as if to prove my point about Obama’s third-world sympathies, Obama compared himself today to Gandhi and Nelson Mandela rather than to an American president such as Abraham Lincoln or Roosevelt."

Barry is as sympathetic to the 3rd world as much as he is sympathetic to public schools. He is just selling a bridge to the libtards. Again.

I think Breitbart just had bad genes. Aren't you always talking about genes? Do they matter except when they don't?

Having said that, IF and that's IF in capital letters, he was killed, it would be by Hollywood. He ran a website called Big Hollywood, which was critical of Hollywood. People who spill beans in HW are killed. HW is a true sinkhole of depravity.

For example - and this is only one, the guy who wrote a book exposing what a debauched man David Geffen is died suddenly 4 years later. No explanation. Just died after he came home from a party. Yeah, he was gay, but apparently healthy. Just keeled over and died, age 40.

He told too much truth about Geffen and someone slipped something in his drink, I think.

Posted by: Conquistador

"I bet people dressed up in pimp outfits will crash his funeral."

That was funny as hell, thanks!


I certainly don't buy into this conspiracy theory that Obama had anything to do with offing Breitbart. Sure, I bet champagne glasses were clicking in the oval office last night and Obama and his staff were as happy as those hate filled crazies on twitter were that he was dead. After all, he did embarrass the White House during the Sherrod fiasco.

But nobody in the White House was afraid of Breitbart or what any possible video tapes may show. No matter how damaging the tapes are, they won't air on the MSM until they have their excuse story to go with it. And without that, the average independent who only gets his news from a half hour of TV news every night and the occasional glance at a newspaper headline will barely be aware of the story, and will be told at the same time it doesn't matter.

Obama was successfully elected President even though his mentor was a race baiting crackpot and the buddy who launched him into politics was a terrorist. I doubt there is anything on the tapes that can top that and if they do, it still won't matter.

Anyone remember when the whole Hawaii birth issue first came up, and then suddenly within two months of it being an issue, Obama's grandmother -- the only person alive who could provide a personal account -- "became gravely sick and died".

I can't work out which is more disturbing: HS went mad some time ago and we only noticed once he started with the Brietbart conspiracies, or HS has been mad all along, but we took him for someone who was reasonably sensible (but slightly too fond of Mitt Romney).

Breitbart had a lot of enemies;didn't he single handedly destroy Anthony weiner's career?

"HS: I didn't say that Breitbart was assassinated."

Sorry about that, wasn't alert. I do know there's a conspiracy hypothesis going around stating that the Obama administration had him assassinated.

"I admire Jimmy Carter even more now but we didn't even have bases in the region at the time."

We had a strong military ally - Iran - until Saint Jimmah dicked that up.

"I doubt our approval meant much to Saddam."

It certainly did, since he wanted help from Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, which we were in a position to veto.

"He only really opposed the Iraq war."

He opposed the way the war in Afghanistan was fought - and then proceeded to fight it in *exactly* the same way.

"that's like the GOP warning about black helicopter raids by Clinton's police/military thugs only then to preside over the largest expansion of executive power in modern history. Now they've reverted back to the dictator talk as evidenced by your own belief that Obama "disregards the Constitution"."

The GOP never claimed Dubya was a Pure White Unicorn and the Most Ethical President Since Saint Jimmah, so this is irrelevant and pathetic. Come on, after eight years of screaming about Bushitler, is your best argument for Bambi that he is "no worse than Dubya" ethically?

After NDAA, this is not surprising.

"Breitbart had a lot of enemies;didn't he single handedly destroy Anthony weiner's career?"

Nope, Weiner destroyed that all by himself.

The comments to this entry are closed.