Hat tip to Lawrence Auster for finding this article by Kyle Rogers in which Rogers presents actual accounts from newspaper insiders about how they intentionally censor race from crime reporting.
People who follow alt-right blogs know that this has been happening based on the mountains of evidence supplied by bloggers such as Auster, but I think this is the first time I have read about the actual process newspapers use to censor these stories.
Also, the MSMS censors know what they are doing. Regular people would have much different views about race, views that the liberal elite don’t want people to have, if they routinely read news reports which include the race of criminal perpetrators.
Had it not been for the MSM's coverup the Norfolk attack would have remained a local story and quickly faded from view.
Posted by: Peter | May 16, 2012 at 01:40 PM
Yes and I've been evangelizing in my local paper's online comment section about HBD and the alt-right. I get very receptive feedback but I'm comments are quickly deleted.
Posted by: Conquistador | May 16, 2012 at 01:44 PM
"People who follow alt-right blogs"
Could you please not refer to HBD as being the same as alternative right? AltRight published an article promoting genocide of all blacks. In addition they want to instate Norse god worship. And of course antisemitism is not acceptable.
Posted by: The Undiscovered Jew | May 16, 2012 at 02:11 PM
Conquistador, HBD will get deleted almost every time. We need to start by emphasizing the need for complete information and robust public discussion about a complex issue like race. You can also work in that not being able to discuss race honestly, is a barrier to dealing with cultural/environmental factors like fatherless families and low education priority.
Once THAT groundwork is laid, then HBD can start coming in.
Posted by: RandyB | May 16, 2012 at 02:15 PM
"AltRight published an article promoting genocide of all blacks."
What??!! I want a link. I don't believe this.
When I stopped following Alt Right it was I would say 90% about Israel and 10% about random weirdness. If what you say is true I guess they've expanded their horizons.
Posted by: Otis the Sweaty | May 16, 2012 at 02:23 PM
We need to flood with our knowledge that they are hacks--that when they obscure the truth, they are involved in cover-ups, that they are irresponsible and that they are practicing editing that flies in the face of honest journalism.
Question: would they mention the race of white youths who "happened to have shaved heads" and who attacked a Jewish guy? A black guy?
Hey, what if those white youths didn't have shaved heads? Would they mention their race if their victim was Jewish, black, Hispanic, etc.
Of course.
Time to go after the media and that includes the biggies at the network level.
How many of the mobs of black youths this last summer did any of them report on?
Posted by: g | May 16, 2012 at 02:29 PM
"AltRight published an article promoting genocide of all blacks."
Have blacks contributed anything to the human race....at all? Nobody would miss them. The article was likely framed that way.
Posted by: Conquistador | May 16, 2012 at 02:31 PM
"Have blacks contributed anything to the human race....at all? "
Have gypsies? Nobody ever talks about killing them off. Atleast blacks are good athletes and entertainers.
Posted by: Otis the Sweaty | May 16, 2012 at 02:55 PM
@The Undiscovered Jew:
Thank you. That totally needed to be said. Though the vast majority of HBD'ers are right-of-center, let's not confuse the two things.
@RandyB:
It was a comment on a mainstream article (this one, in fact: http://www.tnr.com/blog/80669/getting-darnell-the-corners-why-america-should-ride-the-anti-drug-war-wave) that led me to HBD.
@Conquistador:
I hope you're just reciting what the article actually said and that that is not what you actually believe.
Posted by: JayMan | May 16, 2012 at 03:00 PM
@ Otis the Sweaty
I believe gypsies were actually targeted by the Nazi regime. I also think black athleticism is overrated. The NBA is a failing league and in the NFL helmets conceal race for the most part.
Posted by: Conquistador | May 16, 2012 at 03:09 PM
@Conquistador
They gave us supersoakers man. Supersoakers!
Posted by: scott | May 16, 2012 at 03:15 PM
I love the NFL and I can guarantee you the quality of play would be substantially less if there were no black players
Posted by: Otis the Sweaty | May 16, 2012 at 03:19 PM
"What??!! I want a link. I don't believe this."
www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021708.html
"Have blacks contributed anything to the human race....at all? Nobody would miss them."
Even if you support deporting any diaspora blacks all blacks to Africa, there's no reason to kill the remaining ones in Africa. They're only outside Africa because they were brought outside either as slaves or as relatively recent immigrants. If they weren't imported as immigrants, Africa would have no effect on the outside world.
Posted by: The Undiscovered Jew | May 16, 2012 at 03:27 PM
Ya gotta wonder, where are our white gangs? or our white hoodlums? what happened to the Jets and the Sharks?
This is kinda crazy. There should be a natural counterpart to this problem but it seems to have been bred out of the race.
Posted by: jeanne | May 16, 2012 at 04:20 PM
"At least blacks are good athletes and entertainers"
Yes, because ego-inflated athletes/musicians and middle-school level comedy has pulled us out of the Dark Ages. They're so essential.
Posted by: famously nameless | May 16, 2012 at 04:37 PM
I used the BBC complaints service to complain about their omission of the race of several youths who stabbed an Argentinian tourists a few months ago.
The report had noted that police were looking for suspects and included age and gender, but omitted race. Other UK tabloids had mentioned race in the police description of the attackers, so I complained on the basis the BBC were not accurately reporting the police description.
I got a response saying that their policy is not to mention race unless clearly relevant to the story.
Posted by: Kiwiguy | May 16, 2012 at 05:17 PM
btw. I would recommend that other readers make use of the online complaints service that many MSM news outlets have.
I also complained to tv3 in NZ about the accuracy of using the out of date Trayvon Martin photo. Am awaiting a response.
Posted by: Kiwiguy | May 16, 2012 at 05:19 PM
Someone in the HBD-osphere really should start documenting all the cracks forming in the damn - its about to burst.
The article linked to above.
MSM media coverage of the Norfolk cover-up.
Academic calling out black studies programs.
NC AG looking into fraud in black studies program.
Posted by: Van | May 16, 2012 at 05:27 PM
Newark beatings: "it's an 80% black area and the concert was full of white rock and roll fans."
Derbyshire rule "b": Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.
Packs of violent blacks running about, randomly attacking whites, largely with total impunity. It's a good thing that they tend not to stray far from their ghettos.
[HS: It was a white concert. I've been to downtown Newark. It never really felt that safe. Last time I was there was three years ago for a job interview.]
Posted by: jon | May 16, 2012 at 05:37 PM
Hmmmm:
""At least blacks are good athletes and entertainers"
Yes, because ego-inflated athletes/musicians and middle-school level comedy has pulled us out of the Dark Ages. They're so essential."
Comments like these aren't exactly helping the cause to let HBD go mainstream...
Posted by: JayMan | May 16, 2012 at 07:10 PM
Half Sigma, you are correct.
The MSM censorship extended to the case of your fellow Penn Alum Adam Anhang.
You will recall that Adam was a typical hard working beta male and decided to marry a Puerto Rican. When the marriage ran in to trouble his wife's brothers suggested that she hire someone to kill her husband. She accepted her brothers' advice and Adam was killed.
No mention of the racial angle in the media
Posted by: Levg | May 16, 2012 at 08:17 PM
@ JayMan,
Which comment lead you to HBD? The one by 'ironyroad ' noting the high spending per pupil for af-american schools?
Posted by: Kiwiguy | May 16, 2012 at 08:45 PM
"I also complained to tv3 in NZ about the accuracy of using the out of date Trayvon Martin photo. Am awaiting a response."
They really run this story in New Zealand? Holy Crap. Must be a slow news year.
Posted by: FlaDoug | May 16, 2012 at 09:13 PM
I worked at a top-25 circulation newspaper from roughly the mid-90s to the middle of the last decade. I was there during a lot of those policy discussions about how race would be cited and referenced in news as well as in feature/entertainment articles.
The mantra was words to the effect of 'only cite race when it's 'germane' to the particular piece, etc., blah-blah.
Problem is, the very fact of what makes race a 'germane' facet of a story is itself vulnerable to contemporary whims, currents and fancies; thus, you'd often find that even in crime stories in which the perpetrator was not yet in custody, race was often omitted in the description, replaced by telling but evasive phrases like 'dark' or 'deeply complected.'
The mid-'90s were a weird time for p.c.; a lot of regrettable pieties were indulged. Part of the problem was that there truly WERE many unnecessarily racist overtones that were unneccessary common in mass medi prior to that time, and a lot of the corrective steps that have now become norms were overly compensatory and heavy-handed.
And readers sometimes blindly accept such norms, however askew, and complain if they don't see them maintained. You may have readers writing to the editor and claiming an article is 'racist' merely because it notes that the at-large suspect in a bank robbery is a black male of a certain height and weight.
Posted by: nikcrit | May 16, 2012 at 09:44 PM
Similarly, there are black snipers that randomly targetted a white man in Kansas City, police think they will target other whites, but the media in Kansas city won't publish the race of the perps. Google it the snipers are still at large
Posted by: fdsdfs | May 16, 2012 at 10:05 PM
There is a book 'Coloring the News' which covers this subject.
Also, check out these guidelines from the National Union of Journalists in UK & Ireland :)
"Statement on race reporting
1. The NUJ believes that the development of racist attitudes and the growth of fascist parties pose a threat to democracy, the rights of trade union organisations, a free press and the development of social harmony and well-being.
2. The NUJ believes that its members cannot avoid a measure of responsibility in fighting the evil of racism as expressed through the mass media.
3. The NUJ reaffirms its total opposition to censorship but equally reaffirms its belief that press freedom must be conditioned by responsibility and an acknowledgement by all media workers of the need not to allow press freedom to be abused to slander a section of the community or to promote the evil of racism.
4. The NUJ believes the methods and lies of the racists should be publicly and vigorously exposed.
5. The NUJ believes that newspapers and magazines should not originate material which encourages discrimination on grounds of race or colour, as expressed in the NUJ's rule book and code of conduct.
6. The NUJ recognises the right of members to withhold their labour on grounds of conscience where employers are providing a platform for racist propaganda.
7. The NUJ believes that editors should ensure that coverage of race stories should be placed in a balanced context.
Race reporting
• Only mention someone’s race if it is strictly relevant. Check to make sure you have it right. Would you mention race if the person was white?
• Do not sensationalise race relations issues; it harms black people and it could harm you....
Reporting racist organisations
• When interviewing representatives of racist organisations or reporting meetings or statements or claims, journalists should carefully check all reports for accuracy and seek rebutting or opposing comments. The anti-social nature of such views should be exposed.
• Do not sensationalise by reports, photographs, film or presentation the activities of racist organisations.
• Seek to publish or broadcast material exposing the myths and lies of racist organisations and their anti-social behaviour.
• Do not allow the letters column or ‘phone-in’ programmes to be used to spread racial hatred in whatever guise."
http://www.mediawise.org.uk/www.mediawise.org.uk/display_page8a15.html?id=648
Posted by: Kiwiguy | May 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM
Two articles about race on American Thinker today. More cracks in the damn.
Posted by: Van | May 17, 2012 at 09:47 AM
Maryland politician publicly states that black thugs are a problem
Posted by: Van | May 17, 2012 at 12:57 PM
"The NBA is a failing league"
By what standards? Ratings wise, it's doing very well.
Posted by: Richard | May 17, 2012 at 01:32 PM
"By what standards? Ratings wise, it's doing very well."
Until 2011-2012 the NBA's ratings had been on a pretty long and consistent slide since Michael Jordan retired. David Stern's institution of a professional dress code in 2005 was the first acknowledgement that the NBA had a worsening image problem.
However, the league did see a pretty healthy jump in ratings this year, probably due to the marketability of emerging family-friendly YouTube darlings like Blake Griffin, Chris Paul, Jeremy Lin and even small-marketers like Kevin Love, Ricky Rubio or Kyrie Irving.
This newer generation of stars lacks the arrogance (and overdone tattoos) of the LeBron Jameses and Carmelo Anthonys of the league.
Posted by: Camlost | May 17, 2012 at 03:04 PM
It suddenly caught my eye that I've been consistently using the wrong dam. Damn.
Posted by: Van | May 17, 2012 at 04:56 PM
According to Wiki, the NBA's ratings have been rising since 2007, not 2011. And even at the "low" point, it was getting ratings as good as MLB. I bet a lot of people here wish the NBA was a failed league, because it confirms their comforting belief that all whites are secretly racist and avoid black entertainment when given a choice.
Posted by: Richard | May 17, 2012 at 11:46 PM
@Kiwiguy:
It's not there anymore, unfortunately.
Posted by: JayMan | May 20, 2012 at 06:01 PM
"According to Wiki, the NBA's ratings have been rising since 2007, not 2011. And even at the "low" point, it was getting ratings as good as MLB."
The NBA owes its resurgence to Mark Zuckerburg, more than anything else. Social media has been huge for the NBA, since it's very easy to view your nightly highlight dunks and blocks in tiny Youtube-size snippets.
But the NBA's appeal is pretty narrow, though. It's a very young and brown/black demographic that makes up the bulk of the viewership.
Take a look at the commercials - it's always very ghettofied low-brow stuff, usually with little jive-talking talking dolls hawking soda, McDonald's or sneakers.
Posted by: camlost@love.com | May 20, 2012 at 07:44 PM