« Shellie Zimmerman arrested and charged with perjury | Main | Zimmerman is not a deity »

June 13, 2012

Comments

They'll close whitopia schools under one pretext or another and bus the kids to the NAM schools

An integrated school in the future will look more like 30% white and Asian, and 70% NAM. In this integrated school, the NAMs will outnumber the whites and instead of NAMs picking up white middle class values, the white students will pick up dysfunctional NAM values. The whites who attend these school will be poor prole whites and not the middle class whites with the good values, because part of those middle class values dictate that you should ensure your children attend good schools.

In the future? You don't have kids in public school, do you? Because your "future" has been reality for at least the last 15 years. Or at least it coincides with my experience having children who attended public schools in Louisiana and North Carolina.

"An integrated school in the future will look more like 30% white and Asian, and 70% NAM. In this integrated school, the NAMs will outnumber the whites and instead of NAMs picking up white middle class values, the white students will pick up dysfunctional NAM values." - Half Sigma


It's already happening in fact. The last two years of high school I attended a majority NAM school. The few attractive white females are now baby mamas with black and brown babies. Every white father's worst nightmare realized. There was also a major demand for charter schools in the area. Gee I wonder why....

Bye bye, Western Civilization...hello Mad Max style dystopia.

I'm a Millennial, and I'm not sure that I agree with your assessment. My generation is starting to reach the age where we're marrying and having children - this age has been pushed back to about 30 for us. So we're the ones who are going to determine the trends when it comes to school integration.

I do agree that most parents, from any generation, want to send their kids to the best schools possible, and in most cases, the best schools are also the schools where the majority of the children are white. But I doubt that most people under 30 are overtly interested in segregating their kids; this doesn't seem to be a value that is held by today's generation of white people. One reason is that multicultural curriculum is ubiquitously taught in public schools.

Even if young whites have a subconscious desire to follow in the path of their parents and move to a place that is free from NAMs, many will lack the financial ability to do so. Millennial graduated high school soon after 9/11, have faced an economy that is constantly shedding jobs, and have tens of thousands of dollars worth of student loan debt.

Unlike the previous generations, we can't access easy credit and go live in the suburbs. Further, the price of living in a nice place has skyrocketed; thanks to the rise in gas prices and utilities, it would be financially crushing for most young people to live in a secluded area.

Because of these factors, I think that "white flight" is going to be less realistic for a large percentage of young whites. On the other side of the coin, despite the statistics, I larger number of NAMs have actually done quite well for themselves financially. While fewer young whites than ever can afford the same quality of life as their parents, more NAMs are surpassing their parents' standard of living. So we're seeing even the coveted suburban and private schools become more diverse.

This will be a very interesting topic as middle class Whites are repopulating the major cities after decades of White flight and urban plight.

Take NYC for example, most middle class Whites (who are slowly becoming the majority) will not send their kids to the any of the countless dsyfunctional public schools run by the liberals. These schools have an overrepresentation of NAMs hence their dysfunctionality and undesirability. I expect to see these schools just like public housing projects to become a form of segregation, a symbol of failure and disenfranchisement, all engineered by our delusional liberals who will eventually choke themselves up when they can't swallow any of their mess anymore.

To me, NAMs in NYC are Black Americans, Puerto Ricans and Dominicans. These 3 groups that have been pandered by the libs to bid their ugly agendas. The other Latinos such as Mexicans, Central and South Americans are not as quite on the same category as they are.

This is exactly right.

Down south in places like Charlotte and Raleigh, the busing and forced integration programs currently consist of spreading the "at risk" kids across as many majority white schools as possible. Thus, you have no single school filled with "low performing" students.

With less whites in the public schools this will become increasingly more difficult, and the liberals will have to scramble for more non IQ-related excuses to explain away the obvious shortcomings of black and mestizo students.

The black middle class is disproportionately employed by government. As government at all levels shrinks in the future due to declining tax revenues and more blacks lose their government jobs, you may see fewer blacks living out in the suburbs. That might mean fewer black kids in suburban schools. On the other hand, as AE says, whites might not be able to afford the suburbs either because of rising gas prices and the cost of long commutes. If middle class whites end up being forced to live in cities near the black underclass, they will demand higher standards in the public schools, expelling unruly minority students and getting rid of (mostly black) incompetent teachers. They will try to put Michelle Rhee types in charge to implement those changes and there will be a lot of resistance to that from blacks.

I have nothing against NAMs per se, but I can't stand low-class criminally inclined trash, which are characteristics correlated with NAMs. Most major cities in the US are lost causes. No amount of funding, computers, increased standards, etc will remedy the issue. It's just a fact that overall IQ levels are decreasing in the US for various reasons and prole drift is infecting people of all classes. I expect income inequality to increase and social mobility to decrease as time goes on. I don't expect anything to be done about this trend, so all I can do is make the best of the situation by living in an area with few low-class criminally inclined trash.

Well, not all NAM majority schools are bad:
"In fact, 30 of the 100 schools that comprise this year's Gold Medal List have minority populations that exceed 40 percent, with seven schools boasting minority populations higher than 95 percent."
http://www.usnews.com/education/high-schools/articles/2010/06/08/schools-populated-with-minorities-are-among-nations-best-high-schools

And yes, some of the schools featured have black or hispanic majorities.

[HS: There are many bogus lists of the best high schools, and then there's the real list:

http://www.halfsigma.com/2011/06/bogus-list-of-top-high-schools-vs-real-list.html ]

"Down south in places like Charlotte and Raleigh, the busing and forced integration programs currently consist of spreading the "at risk" kids across as many majority white schools as possible. Thus, you have no single school filled with "low performing" students."

I believe Wake County (the county system in which Raleigh is located), is in the processing of returning to 'neighborhood' schools.

There are many good high schools in Wake County, despite the county as a whole being almost 30% black/Hispanic (and certainly higher among those still in school) -- there are 'magnet' schools (such as William G Enloe, which usually produces 10-15 National Merit Scholars every year) in which whites/Asians and blacks/Hispanics 'attend' the same school, but might as well be segregated, with the whites/Asians taking the demanding Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate classes and wealthy suburban schools like Green Hope in western Wake County that are still overwhelmingly white, with a small smattering of Asians.

I think promoting homosexuality in the schools is where liberals have their enthusiasm these days. It's much cooler than racial stuff.

Why are liberals so big on homosexuality, when homosexuals are such a small part of the population? I think because love of homosexuals is the ultimate class marker.

"I believe Wake County (the county system in which Raleigh is located), is in the processing of returning to 'neighborhood' schools. "

No it isn't, the fight was lost. The NAACP got involved and the conservatives in North Raleigh had to get up the effort.

"I actually concede that this situation would be beneficial to the black students because they would pick up white middle class values from the dominant white majority."

It doesn't work that way. White folks aren't Christ. They can't just touch you and fix you or some other crap. Mixing has just brought folks down. Not only have blacks not benefitted, whites have degenerated. People of any sort have to be indoctrinated to work hard and behave in socially constructive ways. It has to be backed up with positive and negative reinforcement. We don't have any of that. We just have the fantasy that blacks will follow the "good" white example. Or that sitting next to white students makes other students smarter, or some other wishful thinking with no basis. Asians don't believe this crap. They have their kids insulated from low class American culture by only having them among those who least intrude on them.

AE --

I have to disagree with your assessment. Just look at this map below, by the New York Times. The present segregation in enlightened/liberal/lefty New York is extreme.

http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer

Your post makes a point:
"My generation is starting to reach the age where we're marrying and having children - this age has been pushed back to about 30 for us."

That's exactly it. Many middle class folks are waiting a *long* time to reach a reasonably strong financial position before getting married.

Meanwhile, most minorities have children much earlier, most often outside of wedlock, and never reach that kind of strong position. Consider that among African Americans today, 75% of kids are born outside of wedlock. Considering that the correlation between marriage and income, wealth is extreme, most in this group simply cannot afford homes in the leafy, expensive suburbs or the high-end urban areas in significant numbers. Among these groups, the established professionals are not the ones having most of the children.

Clements High School is one of the highest performing public high schools in the US and yet its web page states the following goal:


"1. We will increase the number of our tenth-grade African American and Economically Disadvantaged students performing at a proficient level on the Math portion of the TAKS test by ten percentage points."


http://campuses.fortbendisd.com/campuses/chs/about.cfm

..If middle class whites end up being forced to live in cities near the black underclass, they will demand higher standards in the public schools..

Or they will just stop having kids.

AE --
I have to disagree with your assessment. Just look at this map below, by the New York Times. The present segregation in enlightened/liberal/lefty New York is extreme.
http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/explorer
Your post makes a point:
"My generation is starting to reach the age where we're marrying and having children - this age has been pushed back to about 30 for us."
That's exactly it. Many middle class folks are waiting a *long* time to reach a reasonably strong financial position before getting married.
Meanwhile, most minorities have children much earlier, most often outside of wedlock, and never reach that kind of strong position. Consider that among African Americans today, 75% of kids are born outside of wedlock. Considering that the correlation between marriage and income, wealth is extreme, most in this group simply cannot afford homes in the leafy, expensive suburbs or the high-end urban areas in significant numbers. Among these groups, the established professionals are not the ones having most of the children.

Blacks infect white schools when the black has destroyed their own.

Whites stick around for a while until TNB inevitably arises, then evacuate.

Repeat Cycle.

"What I don’t know the answer to is whether liberal social engineering types will admit defeat on this issue and give up on the idea of integrated schools as a major policy goal, or will they keep at it even though it’s impossible, put in keeping at it they will force whites to move further and further away from NAMs?"

I wonder who benefits from this disarray?

"I have nothing against NAMs per se, but I can't stand low-class criminally inclined trash, which are characteristics correlated with NAMs".

Here in NY, Black immigrants from the Caribbean and Africa, and the Mestizos from Mexico, Central and South America are NAMs. However, they are less prone to criminality and are somewhat better in work ethic than their lazy African American, Puerto Rican and Dominican counterparts.

Not suprisingly, these 3 groups are the most sought after by the liberals when they need a host victim to further their agenda. It's basically a symbiosis of 2 diabolical forces where liberals are the stronger of the 2 parasites.

Democrats has always been the party for NAMs and the power elite who hate the majority of the general public. They especially hate upper-middle since they are the primary competition.

Eventually the "educated" white liberals will be out bred and replaced by NAMs, while the welfare state will collapse due to the nonexistent middle class taxpayers and the army of single mothers and their bastard criminal children wrecking social and economic havoc.

The trendsetters have already expatriated to Europe or Asia.

Since by 2025, a quarter of the US is suppose to be Hispanic and another 13% being African American. I highly doubt the percentage of African Americans will stay constant when planned parenthood gets no funding.

Proximity + diversity = racial conflict. Have fun with that.

http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/02/11/us-population-projections-2005-2050/

"If middle class whites end up being forced to live in cities near the black underclass, they will demand higher standards in the public schools."

Explain to us how a group that is weak enough to be subject to coercion ('forced') can nevertheless be robust enough to 'demand' anything. And apparently you're unaware that city school systems are black patronage dumps?

Young people under 30 (I'm just over 30) are brainwashed about "diversity" and multiculturalism, supporting gay rights, etc. However, when marriage and kids are involved, they know the drill. I'm in this age group. The goal is to have kids in a school that is mostly white and middle class or higher, by any means necessary. The diversity crap isn't something they truly believe.

What about aristocratic values and working class values (the real ones found in politically conscious factory towns who vote Labour/Communist). Middle class values is what led us to this state of failure, better to encourage a three-tier value system, a noble/warrior class, a priestly class and a farmer/laborer class.

What's also interesting is that many Asians who attend these horrible public schools filled mostly by NAMs come out to be stellar students. Now that's what the liberals don't want us to hear. It's always a sisyphus effect that they are implementing. They drumroll one problem and then make more because White racism on their beloved NAMs is never solved.

"Explain to us how a group that is weak enough to be subject to coercion ('forced') can nevertheless be robust enough to 'demand' anything. And apparently you're unaware that city school systems are black patronage dumps?"

When I say "forced", I don't mean physically coerced. I don't think whites will be rounded up at gunpoint and forcibly moved. If peak oil theory is true and gas prices go high enough, whites just won't be able to afford to live in far flung suburbs. If they have to live in a city, their options will be take political control of the public schools and improve them (where they can make up a majority after they've returned in large enough numbers), form private schools, or just not have kids as Abelard suggested. I think black dysfunction may start to decline because the underlying welfare state that created it has run out of money and will start to wither. Maybe I'm just an optimist.

"when non-Hispanic white babies are less than 50% of the population."

White babies were 54% of births in 2010. Check the CDC numbers, not the bogus projections the media used.

"What I don’t know the answer to is whether liberal social engineering types will admit defeat on this issue"

You know what would be a good way to wreck the liberal social engineers and get the process started on reversing non-white immigration?

How about defunding the liberal arts departments by letting undergrads study under a British/Australian style curriculum that has no gened requirements and lets students get an undergrad degree with 60-80 credits.

Most liberal arts teachers teach gened classes rather than liberal arts majors because few students major in the liberal arts but nearly all freshmen and sophmore undergrads need to take gened classes. If those students could get a bachelor's in only 2-3 years with 60-80 credits (instead of the current 120 credits) they would save two to three years in tuition dollars and the liberal arts teachers would be out of their jobs.

Also government mandated price controls on college tuition will help cutoff the flow of $$$ going to less profitable liberal arts departments.

The other bureocratic institutions of liberalism, the news media and public sector unions are being driven out of business by tablets and the internet and by Scott Walker like public union reforms.

If American liberal arts departments were wiped out through budgetary measures, we could have an conservative renaissance in this country going.

Using the tuition crisis to sneak in anti-liberal arts legislation through the Trojan horse of "College affordability for the middle class" would be a great way to cripple the left, which benefits from having so many of their bureaucratic mechanisms hidden away in sectors of the governmental apparatus/Cathedral that can't be held accountable for their disastrous policy positions.

Getting on the "College Affordability" bandwagon would certainly be more productive than stalking "Out of Sight" Wealthy families at night, Sigma...

"If peak oil theory is true and gas prices go high enough, whites just won't be able to afford to live in far flung suburbs."

This is one of the things that frustrates me the most with people around here (upstate SC). Around 60% of vehicles I see are heavier vehicles. The county is around 2/3's white, and so many must be dumping money into gas that they can't afford while leaving themselves wide open to price swings when the crunch really hits. And what do they say when I tell them that there's a problem coming... "You have to have faith in god." The implied aggression here is nearly unfathomable. They will get what they deserve for their laziness (or simple inability to think/plan.) It's all very Murray/"state of white america". They aren't getting good direction. Their leaders are chanting drill, drill, drill.

Mark,

You are an optimist. Somalia is hardly a welfare state, neither is the Congo. That's more likely to be our future, especially in light of the incredible population boom in Sub Saharan Africa.

Suport for integration among white liberal types does seem to be declining in action if not in speech. A lot of SWPL types in liberal bastions like the Boston area or Portland are home schooling their kids. Not to get away from NAMs (because those areas are still pretty NAM free anyway), but because they want their special little flowers not to be bored (or bullied) in school systems geared towards the middle of the white IQ range. As SWPLs continue to disengage from lower class white society, I am not sure how much energy they are going to have to keep up the integration fight.

Any liberal or progressive who claims that they are comfortable being in a situation or place which is majority black or Hispanic is lying.

I have worked with many progressives and the ones who live in the urban centers all send their children to private schools or to magnet schools. All of the progressives learn how to claim that the local school had a bad principal or had bad teachers or was not funded adequately. But the end results is that the children of those progressives always end up sending their children to schoools that are over 80% white and Asian.

Gasoline may be expensive but private schools in the center or urban centers are even more expensive.

School integration in big cities is mostly either over or is about trying to lure white people back into the public school system. Look at the LAUSD, where something like 70 percent of the students are Hispanic and most whites have either fled to private schools or enclaves like Beverly Hills, La Cañada and Santa Monica that run their own school districts. The whole magnet/charter school program tries to lure white parents back by offering all sorts of specialized academic goodies (Mandarin immersion, robotics, etc.) and as a result you have a handful of largely white public schools with a sprinkling of bright, well-behaved black and Hispanic kids (the ones whose parents were together enough to get them into the district's byzantine transfer system), and a whole bunch of 99 percent plus black/Hispanic schools in downtown and south LA where half a dozen kids in the entire school score above 1000 combined on the SATs (because the smart ones have been skimmed off by busing and magnet/charter schools.)

"A lot of SWPL types in liberal bastions like the Boston area or Portland are home schooling their kids."

This is basically the future of what white families are going to look like, increasingly divested from "public" institutions.

"I have worked with many progressives and the ones who live in the urban centers all send their children to private schools or to magnet schools. All of the progressives learn how to claim that the local school had a bad principal or had bad teachers bad this and bad that...."

This is what I call the Liberal Sisyphus effect. Liberals believe the disenfranchisement of NAMs will never be eradicated because there is always inequality and White racism. NAMs have been given every opportunity where they just squander them away and liberals will say it's because of White racism, so let's get back to the drawing board to find another reason to blame it on Whites.

Wir mussen die NAM ausrotten!

Seriously, it'll probably be a slow slide into South Africa unless the demographic tide can be averted.

"If peak oil theory is true and gas prices go high enough, whites just won't be able to afford to live in far flung suburbs."

This is one of the things that frustrates me the most with people around here (upstate SC). Around 60% of vehicles I see are heavier vehicles."

Peak Oil is junk science.

America has recoverable oil shale reserves equivalent to the entire world's oil reserves.

"Suport for integration among white liberal types does seem to be declining in action if not in speech."

I thought Jared Taylor showed school integration had basically come to a halt in American schools?

"I have nothing against NAMs per se, but I can't stand low-class criminally inclined trash, which are characteristics correlated with NAMs. Most major cities in the US are lost causes."

Eduardo Saverin has shown us they don't have to remain lost causes.

Low intelligence legal immigrants and the money we've poured to uplift them are obviously failed projects and it's long past time America cut her losses on this investment with "citizenship buyouts that will pay our low IQ friends to turn in their citizenship in the spirit (if not $$$ value) of Eduardo Saverin and take their worthless spawn back to the mother country.

It would be quite easy to reverse non-white immigration with big enough cash buyouts of, say, over $50,000 per family member. With citizenship/Saverin buyouts of at least $50,000, we could clear out tens of millions of low IQ immigrants in a matter of years.

Hell, forget paying them even $50,000. Given how many mouth breathing immigrants I see in malls walking around, glancing with their vacant eyes, at electronics, I'd bet that if I were king, a quarter of the NAM population of NYC would willingly turn in their citizenship and leave the city and USA in exchange for $5,000, a few bags of Doritos, 3 packets of cigarettes.

To most legal non-white immigrants, America is just a giant mall they shop at with welfare checks and some small amount of money they make working behind the counter at Taco Bell.

"Low intelligence legal immigrants and the money we've poured to uplift them are obviously failed projects and it's long past time America cut her losses on this investment with "citizenship buyouts that will pay our low IQ friends to turn in their citizenship" "To most legal non-white immigrants, America is just a giant mall they shop at with welfare checks and some small amount of money they make working behind the counter at Taco Bell".

Yes, but how can we convince the corporate tyrants who love to exploit these NAMs as their customers and low level workers? McDonalds will lose a lot of their revenue if it wasn't for a NAM flipping a burger and another one buying it.

Capitalists are like liberals who don't care much about race as long as there is money to be made.

Oakland schools quit busing decades ago, because there weren't any white kids to bus. Oakland is still about one-quarter white, but they're usually younger whites, with chidren under 5, if any.

Not coincidentally, Oakland's schools are terrible. A few years ago, all but one of the high schools were in the bottom 10% statewide. The "good" school, Skyline, in the middle of a pretty white and expensive neighborhood, barely managed to break into the top 75%.

"Peak Oil is junk science.

America has recoverable oil shale reserves equivalent to the entire world's oil reserves." -The Undiscovered Jew

This is junk... faith?

The green river formation may have 2T boe locked up, but there's no way we get at it in a timely fashion if conventional oil starts falling fast. The densest 10% is worth planning for, and represents a resource about equivalent to the Tar sands, meaning it will be mined, and can be ramped up to 1-2M barrels/day over a decade or two, likely with a single digit EROEI (I believe we have a 30:1 EROEI average for conventional oil at present). Outside of those pockets, the EROEI falls sharply, probably not so much that it's "unrecoverable", but we're not just going to be able to turn on the tap when we need it. We're making a faith based dice roll on new technology and new finds making things work, and it might, we've been lucky so far, but it's a major mistake to assume it will just because the gross energy is there.

TUJ,

You keep mentioning Eduardo Saverin in connection with your proposal for citizenship buyouts for non-white immigrants. You do realize that he is of Jewish ancestry and not a typical Brazilian, right?

"You keep mentioning Eduardo Saverin in connection with your proposal for citizenship buyouts for non-white immigrants. You do realize that he is of Jewish ancestry and not a typical Brazilian, right?"

Of course I knew that. His differences with ordinary non-white immigrants aren't relevant to my argument.

I brought up Saverin because he showed it's legally possible for a single naturalized immigrant to be persuaded by a financial cost benefit-analysis to turn in his citizenship and leave the country and for nothing bad to result from it. The stars didn't fall from the sky because an immigrant gave up US citizenship and left, he just packed his bags and handed in his papers.

And if Saverin can be persuaded by financial incentives to give up his citizenship and leave the United States, why couldn't millions of immigrants be persuaded to do the same in exchange for a cash buyout.

"We're making a faith based dice roll on new technology and new finds making things work, and it might, we've been lucky so far, but it's a major mistake to assume it will just because the gross energy is there."'

Well, I see your point. But the technology is likely to get better because the payoffs to making extraction of these hydrocarbons more cost efficient are enormous.

And these are just formations in the US. With new formations being discovered in other parts of the world, (like Russia where they've discovered a formation similar to Bakken but 80 times larger), there's good reason to believe the world will be able to avoid peak oil well into the next century and buy more than enough time to discover better sources of energy.

"Yes, but how can we convince the corporate tyrants who love to exploit these NAMs as their customers and low level workers? McDonalds will lose a lot of their revenue if it wasn't for a NAM flipping a burger and another one buying it."

The corporations can import white immigrants to buy Mcdonald's hamburgers.

The bigger problem is the leftist Cathedral bureaucracy that justifies their employment in the "non-profit sector" it's funding pouring tax revenues down the racial minority sinkhole.

Fortunately, a number of legs in the liberal feedback loop are being dismantled. Scott Walker dealt a decisive defeat against public sector unions by pulling the flow of money to public sector doogooders. The newspaper industry was going bankrupt because of the internet. Now, with tablet computers, the newspapers are driven in to bankruptcy has been greatly accelerated because now even older newspaper subscribers can see that reading news off of a tablet (*especially* an iPad 3) is vastly superior than reading from a computer or print paper.

One leg of the Cathedral which hasn't been knocked out yet is the university system.

The best way to start dismantling the liberal college system would be to use the college loan crisis to sneak in reforms that will lead to the defunding of the liberal arts departments (where the most hardcore leftist fanatics reside) by having the congress or state legislatures force colleges to offer all of their majors in a British style general education free format.

"The few attractive white females are now baby mamas with black and brown babies. Every white father's worst nightmare realized."

"Mixing has just brought folks down. Not only have blacks not benefitted, whites have degenerated."

Last week I read the latest Robert Caro book on LBJ, which contained extensive discussion of the Civil Rights bills of 1957-64. The opponents of Civil Rights thought that miscegenation would have a greatly negative effect and would be inevitable if they didn't hold the line against integration. They were, as we can see now, exactly right. The late Senator Richard Russell can take bitter satisfaction in the afterlife that his dire predictions were more than fulfilled...

"Any liberal or progressive who claims that they are comfortable being in a situation or place which is majority black or Hispanic is lying."

I dunno, I have met plenty of progressives around here who claim to love diversity AND send their kids to diverse public schools.

[HS: They would probably be comfortable at the Harvard Black Law Students Association.]

JP,

And what about the White Male East Asian Female couples you'll see in every major liberal city of America, which seems to be much more prevalent than those of White NAM couples? No one seems to be talking about this form of miscegenation between the 2 higher races. Is it a good thing or a bad one?

Undiscovered Jew,

I think the rise of China as a force to be reckon with, and East Asians becoming a new elite class in America, poses a serious challenge to the whole liberal dichotomy that racial minorities need to be pampered like infants at the expense of everyone else. When push comes to shove, the East Asians will not tolerate this kind of PC horsecrap. There was an incident in a South Philly HS a few years ago where there were a few NAMs who provoked some Asian students that turned into a big fight. Their principal who is a White Liberal Jewish guy went on to defend his beloved NAMs by saying that it was the Asians' fault for refusing to assimilate arousing resentment and suspicion. Now most sane unbiased individuals would say this guy is obviously delusional and in need of mental therapy. If only more people start to realize what kind of individuals these people are, the sooner America will change for the better.

Most Whites aren't comfortable talking about East Asians in a objective way whether they are of the liberal persuasion or not. I assume JP and Undiscovered Jew reluctance to address my posts is obvious. I understand how East Asians, unlike the NAMs of the opposite spectrum, can outcompete Whites when it comes to education and jobs.

The comments to this entry are closed.