« More death threats against Romney. MSM double-standard | Main | Fake hate crime in Louisiana »

October 23, 2012

Comments

Parallel to this story dominating the headlines was that hate crime fraud in Louisiana. Paul Kersey will have a lot to say.

"If her parents had warned her to stay away from black boys, Autumn might still be alive."

Are the parents SWPLs?

I mean really, what the fuck is it going to take? Yes I'm white, and proud of it - but I'm embarrassed for my own people because they're too pussified to stand up against this reverse racist society. White people built this country, and now we're scared to live or even talk in it.

Pathetic.

Just make sure that the advice you give your kids is accurate and statistically informed. They don't need to be overly afraid that black people will murder, rob or rape them, just 10 times more afraid than they would be for a white person.

MV

Blacks are more likely to commit violent crime. In other news, kids eat candy on Haloween.

I have always wondered if blacks are more violent because of their low mean IQ or if it is some other mental trait. I would guess it is probably a set of mental traits.

1. Was there a rape or did they really strangle a 12 year old girl over a bmx bike? Even for "teens" this is shocking. Eventually some victim is going to have a brother and/or father who is going to retaliate. Or some unrelated white person with little to lose will just snap.

2. Charged as juveniles, BULLSHIT.

offtopic:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/49517858

The TSA is moving the naked body scan machines out of the "busy" airports, they are redeploying them in red state flyover country airports.

Busy airports getting relief:
Boston Logan
Chicago O'Hare
Los Angeles LAX
New York JFK
New York LaGuardia Airport
Orlando International Airport
Charlotte Douglas International Airport

Notice anything?

While white parents around the country probably are not giving their sons and daughters the John Derbyshire talk, everyone still knows who to avoid. Everyone knows that blacks, especially large groups of blacks, are inevitable trouble and that one should avoid them as much as possible.

needname, no not everyone knows that blacks are inevitable trouble. I grew up in an area where there were very few blacks and because of tracking I only knew three blacks: all were mixed-race girls who did really well in school (I think that two of them are doctors). I'm not saying that I was friends with three, I wasn't friends with any of them. I mean that those were the only three that I knew well enough to form an opinion about them. I knew that blacks were more violent and less intelligent but I had no experience with it first hand.

Urban people and southerners assume that everyone knows all about blacks. The rest of American doesn't know about blacks, except from what they see on TV.

News reports say there are no signs of sexual assault but the they probably just groped her and made her perform fellatio.

@ Undiscovered Jew

Not SWPLs, working class "proles"

@needname

I don't think that's neccesarily true. I think the SWPLs for all their screeching about racism know who to avoid, but I think that the working class a lot of the time actually believe the bullshit more than the SWPLs do. Being lower status to begin with they are more anxious about being called a racist, or about feeling like a racist. The white working class is literally being set up to fail, led to the slaughter, etc.

I clicked to another story on the Fox Philly website a pretty White daughter set up her White father to be burglerized by some punks who looked to be black or hispanic she is dating one of the punks. White men need to buck the fuck up and put their feet down or this shit will never end.

Someone is murdered in this country every hour. You can find thousands of incidences with every possible criminal/victim ethnic combination. If you want to argue one ethnic group is more problematic, use aggregate statistics rather than singled out anecdotes. The former appeals to logic, the latter to emotion.

On the bright side, most measures of violence and intentional homicides are at historic lows. This should make your logical brain grateful even if your emotional brain is angry at the details of this incident.

If you suspect that problems such as child homicide are due to largely genetic factors in an ethnic group rather than nurture factors, you should be using your blogging voice to champion more genetic and biology based solutions and improvements. Fueling classic ethnic group anger doesn't seem to serve a productive purpose.

The African American reporter in the video seems quite nice.

I'm curious about the background of the parents (but not curious enough to research). I'm not sure I believe that the majority of BoBo's are not well aware of black behavior, they are highly educated after all. I suspect they talk a good game, are all for having their kids mingle with the wogs at drama class or something but probably have enough sense to discourage their kids from actually spending unsupervised time with them.
I wonder if the father or mother of this girl are ex-military. Ex-military are particularly egregious with their race naivete, they all seem to bristle at the suggestion their "brother" comes from a group of humans who are extraordinary in their cruelty and lack of remorse.

I also don't see the connection between airports

"Parallel to this story dominating the headlines was that hate crime fraud in Louisiana"

So it was a hoax. That's what I thought right away.

@anonymous (October 23, 2012 at 10:51 PM) wrote:

"http://www.cnbc.com/id/49517858

The TSA is moving the naked body scan machines out of the "busy" airports, they are redeploying them in red state flyover country airports.

Busy airports getting relief:
Boston Logan
Chicago O'Hare
Los Angeles LAX
New York JFK
New York LaGuardia Airport
Orlando International Airport
Charlotte Douglas International Airport

Notice anything?"

Really surprising to see that Reagan National and Bush International aren't on the list. And come to think of it, it looks like all the airports on the relief list are in states that went 'blue' in 2008.

Who'd have thought that Orlando and Charlotte would get relief before lager, busier airports in states that went 'red' in 2008 ... like Atlanta Hartsfield, Bush (Houston) & DFW (Dallas)!?!

HS,

Look at the lack of media coverage concerning the shooting outside of Milwaukee. A black man walks into his estranged wife's workplace and kills three people and causes the police to lock down the mall across the street.

As soon as the national media found out the shooter was black, the media lost interest.

Also, image the difference in coverage if two blue collar white male teenagers had killed a black 12 y/o female. The nation would be in the middle of a two minute against whites.

"I have always wondered if blacks are more violent because of their low mean IQ or if it is some other mental trait. I would guess it is probably a set of mental traits."
In our country gypsies comprise 3-4% of population but majority of prison popuplation. Also, they have lower IQ...
I suppose criminal behavior has much to do with low IQ and low impulse control (which go hand in hand).

"Someone is murdered in this country every hour. You can find thousands of incidences with every possible criminal/victim ethnic combination."

Then it should be no problem to find 3 instances in the last 30 days of an Oriental person murdering a black person. Please do so.

"If you want to argue one ethnic group is more problematic, use aggregate statistics rather than singled out anecdotes. The former appeals to logic, the latter to emotion."

I assume you also object to it when people on the Left jump up and down and scream from the rooftops about white-on-black crimes?

Or is "appeal to emotion" only a problem when some people do it?

(That said, I hope this blog doesn't go the way of Lawrence Auster and constantly report on the drumbeat of black-on-white mayhem. Just because it's so depressing.)

Most of the comments are from black people expressing outrage.

It seems like they're building up some self-awareness, they know this shit makes them look bad.

No, it has nothing to do with genetics, however, i do feel there is an excess of violence behaviour among african-AMERICANS youths. I've highlighted americans, because i belive it's a cultural thing. From what i see, american black culture has been diminished to gangsters and pimps, "stupid hoes" and all this crap.

The reason i say it's cultural, it's because here in Brasil, we also have groups that tend to be more violent, and it has nothing to do with race, it's about social status and enviroment, and since here in Brasil we don't have the race cultural division as you have in america, people in slums, wich tend to breed violent kids more often, are from all colors...

That beeing said, i do think the american black community should rethink what they are teaching their youths, and stop beeing so hung up in the past, and they should care less about asserting their race, since in my experience, race is far less influential than the cultural enviroment one have grown into...just as an exemple, the lad that made sure we knew he didn't befriended the 3 black examples he knew, said they were good students and grew up to be doctors, so in a good enviroment, 3 out of 3 became good citzens.

So yes, there is a problem among black americans, but it's not racial, it's cultural.

"Most of the comments are from black people expressing outrage.
It seems like they're building up some self-awareness, they know this shit makes them look bad."

You may be right, the question is whether this concern will turn into concrete action.

"Being lower status to begin with they are more anxious about being called a racist, or about feeling like a racist"

Wow. It's safe to say you don't know any "proles".

"this shit makes them look bad. "
But looking bad works great when your whole business plan is claiming that the looking-bad-ness is caused by others.

Earlier this year, in the Milwaukee area, Wade Michael Page, a man with white supremacist ties, murdered six people and wounded three at a Sikh temple. Obama and Holder weighed in on this event, condemning it as a "hate crime" (which it may have been).

A few days ago, also in the Milwaukee area (is it something in the water?), Radcliffe Franklin Houghton, a black man, killed three people and wounded four (races not reported, but I know the area - they were certainly mostly white). This was briefly reported in the MSM as a result of a "domestic dispute" (his wife, race unknown, was one of the victims).

Now we have a 12 year old white girl, Autumn Pasquale, murdered in Clayton, New Jersey, for her bicycle by two blacks. Her lifeless body was stuffed in a trash container. Undoubtedly this will be described as a "random act of violence" or a "senseless tragedy."

By the way, according to the 2010 census, NAM's constitute about 23% of the population of Clayton. Violent crime is below the national average.

"champion more genetic and biology based solutions and improvements."

You're suggesting eugenics?

Violence isn't necessarily *high* among Blacks; it in reality is anomalously *low* among Western Europeans and East Asians:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

The reason a long history of strong states and internal population replacement.

Strong governments tend to wield a monopoly on violence and punish violent offenders, which tended to remove the offenders' genes from the gene pool.

This explains the difference you see in rates of violence between the Middle East and more tropical areas.

In cold-weather civilizations, the upper classes had a distinct selective advantage, which served to increase IQ and promote the "middle class values" that you guys extol.

This process happened very quickly in Scandinavia as they adopted Christianity and hence stopped inbreeding: http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/outbreeding-self-control-and-lethal-violence/

"Someone is murdered in this country every hour. You can find thousands of incidences with every possible criminal/victim ethnic combination."

Then give us an example of whites killing a 12-year-old black girl.

"On the bright side, most measures of violence and intentional homicides are at historic lows."

Not true. Violent crime increased by 17% last year with the greatest increase of crimes against whites.

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv11.pdf

"Investigators say a parent caught wind that something was going on with the two boys based on a Facebook post. The parent then notified police, which led them to the home and Pasquale's body."

You've got to at least acknowledge the action of the parent who turned their own kids in, that usually doesn't happen, regardless of race. Most parents are more likely to aid in the covering up and denial of their children's crimes.

"So yes, there is a problem among black americans, but it's not racial, it's cultural." - Lucas


You're very naive just one these people who can't let go of their utopian upbringing. Blacks are have no history of advance civilization or sophisticated culture. They are criminals wherever they go and in their own lands (Africa) they specialize only in violence. Not even the simple kind but the brutal kind like using machetes to chop off the limbs of captives. Rape including male on male are also very prominent in African conflicts. They are racially prone to violence and poverty.

"Violence isn't necessarily *high* among Blacks; it in reality is anomalously *low* among Western Europeans and East Asians"

Bingo. Very interesting perspective that to my mind is the right one on a paleoanthropologic level.

Rather than ask ourselves why Blacks are so violent, we should ask ourselves why *we* believe that persuasion>force and are so shocked when other Hominidae act in a different way.

"Then give us an example of whites killing a 12-year-old black girl."

Bingo too. Statistics are everything.

"Wow. It's safe to say you don't know any "proles"" - J1


No he's right you're just thinking of the older generation that was less brainwashed. Whenever I see mixed race dating the white woman is 90% of the time prole. Their fathers are strongly Republican and oppose "socialism" because it brings NAMs into their lower class neighborhoods. Young proles begin associating "racism" with their lower class status and try to distance themselves away from it. School and mass media tell them too.

@Peter
"You may be right, the question is whether this concern will turn into concrete action."

-

I'm curious as to what you think Blacks should do in this particular case.

One of the links on that page is "Robbers terrorize neighborhood". Yep, two more "youth" pictured.

"No he's right you're just thinking of the older generation that was less brainwashed. Whenever I see mixed race dating the white woman is 90% of the time prole. Their fathers are strongly Republican and oppose "socialism" because it brings NAMs into their lower class neighborhoods. Young proles begin associating "racism" with their lower class status and try to distance themselves away from it. School and mass media tell them too."

Conqustador, I think you're partially right. I do believe that most proles aren't so naive as to try and appear less racist than they really are as a class thing: Remember HS's rule, that people have 20/20 vision looking down the class ladder, but are completely blind looking up. I suspect the proles you mention who are so eager to prove they are not racist (they're everywhere here in the South's major cities and university towns), are the "high proles" that were fortunate enough to be born with an above-average IQ and are actually aware of their social status, so they see what people in the class above them do and the beliefs they have and try to mimic them as a means of rejecting the white-trash backgrounds they come from. This is especially the case among the females of this background, and a disproportionate amount of them who go to college major in something useless like communications or art.

But the problem is that these girls don't leave their more primative habits behind. Deep down, they behave in a way that lets them sleep with every alpha male they can spread their legs for.

HS: "If her parents had warned her to stay away from black boys, Autumn might still be alive."

Yep. And if her parents were smart enough to live in a neighborhood w/o blacks, then Autumn would still be alive.

What a shame. She looks like she would have blossomed into a hottie.

I am a black male, I feel nothing but sadness for the parents of this young girl. I will not pretend to understand why the young boys did what they did but I can say for sure that it was absolutely wrong.

My prayers go out to her family and I hope that God will grant them peace in this really dark time.

Clay is right - a post showing the group differences in crime stats would be more helpful than citing individual cases.

[HS: This isn't a post about crime stats, its a post about the media coverup.]

I've always wondered why there aren't more individuals in the MSM who question the policy that covers up any crime with a black perpetrator. You would think that there would be one guy who would be brave enough to risk the penalty that would inevitably come his way. Is everybody in the MSM either totally blind or a coward?

"Or is "appeal to emotion" only a problem when some people do it?"

Finding illogical behavior with the left is easy, but that is no excuse for you or I from being reasonable and logical.

"Violent crime increased by 17% last year with the greatest increase of crimes against whites."

The general trend across a broader time scale (decades and centures) is towards less violence per capita. The exact variations between one year and the next is less relevant.
If violence keeps growing over many years, then I will retract my call for optimism.

"The reason i say it's cultural, it's because here in Brasil, we also have groups that tend to be more violent, and it has nothing to do with race, it's about social status and enviroment,"

You are informally observing a correlation between low socioeconomic status and violence. However, correlation does not mean causation. Genetic factors may still cause both of those traits. There are also counter examples of certain ethnic groups that immigrate and live in the most abject poverty for decades with very low crime rates. Generally after a generation or two, they work their way out of povery, which would point to more of an innate genetic cause.

"HS: This isn't a post about crime stats, its a post about the media coverup."

The media didn't hide or "cover up" the race issue, they show pictures and video of the suspects front and center where their race is obvious. The media just didn't hone in on race and highlight it and spell it out in the headlines. If there is not a productive purpose or message to go with it, highlighting the race issue in a case like this is just miserable, and not what the mass market wants to see on the news.

"You're suggesting eugenics?"

Well, my personal wish is first, to build a better understanding of how genes affect behaviors such as violence, kindness, empathy, honesty, future time preference, academic skills, etc. And secondly, to sell for-profit completely optional treatments for those who wish to change specific traits. I would personally want to make specific modifications to any future children that I have, to give them a better life. If I could change my own genes and give myself higher intelligence or a better personality or better physical health, I would do that to.

"I am a black male, I feel nothing but sadness for the parents of this young girl."

That warms my heart to hear. I would imagine that most adult responsible blacks feel that way and are generally great people.

My wife is black (really) and I love people of all ethnic groups, at least the non-murdering ones :)

This isn't my web site, but I apologize if anything said here offends.

I'm guessing most of the super right-wing types here are huge fans of black intellectuals like Thomas Sowell? There are tons of great, desirable blacks.

"Is everybody in the MSM either totally blind or a coward?"

Yes. If you aren't totally blind or a coward, you're probably not going to display the status markers necessary (e.g., ideological conformity) to make it past the culling rounds and into the position in the first place. Getting hired by the MSM, being admitted to an elite college (and for the record, I go to one, and had to lie shamelessly to get in, so I know whereof I speak), etc., requires (at least the appearance of) absolute and unquestioning adherence to the status quo.

The few who aren't totally blind or cowardly are quickly filtered out of the upper echelons of society. Don't kid yourself: no matter how high up you are on the food chain, there are countless others who can competently fill your role but who, whether from a lack of connections or inability to convincingly dissimulate their true feelings, have been so far shut out. If you want to succeed in this world, you conform to the ideology of the elites -- or they find someone who will.

Today leftists rule the world; tomorrow it could be rightists. It doesn't matter. What does matter, though, is that you suck up to whoever's in power. The people who not only realize this but are sociopathic enough to fully inhabit an artifice of lies as the means to the end of material gain -- because don't kid yourself, nobody in power actually believes this bullshit, if where they live, where they send their kids to school, who they associate with, are any indication -- these are the ones who get ahead in life.

Bravery and perceptiveness are, on balance, a hindrance to social success. One can have one or the other and still win in the high school homeroom of life -- while shamefully lacking in the former, I'm surfeited with the latter, and fraternity brothers do just fine with the opposite tack -- but both together? Don't count on it, James.

Oh please, proles, proles, proles. Is that all? Was Lovecraft a prole? For not graduating high school? He achieved more fame than anyone commenting here can dream of.

Well...for what it's worth. The Talk, by John Derbyshire is a good start if you want to protect your kids in the future.

http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire/print#axzz2AKglNLC2

I've always thought that it was laid out in a rational and logical way. He emphasized the need to judge people as individuals, while, remembering genetic differences and innate biological impulses more prevalent in certain groups. Remind your children to trust their instincts. It worries me when people automatically label him a racist, when he's only putting into words; what we by nature understand.

hungry, hungry Homer -> I have made several copies of your message, because it is in all honesty the most limpid analysis of the media/journalism problem I've seen in a while, and to flatter you even better, the most intelligent comment I've seen on the Internet in the year 2012. I'll quote you once in a while in arguments.

The dilemma of conforming to the elite VS becoming a social outcast indeed sums up 60 years of post-WWII politics. What some rednecks see as dark conspiracies and tight control is actually social conformity and the petit-bourgeois mentality at play.

Personally, I was not able to complete superior studies because the ideological environment had plunged me in moods of black depression. Fortunately, coming from a quite wealthy family, and having the entrepreneur fiber, I managed to achieve a good outcome in life. I wish all the best to you, who seems more calm-tempered than I am.

***[HS: This isn't a post about crime stats, its a post about the media coverup.]***

One of the best articles on the media cover up was by African American economist Walter Williams.

"Since 1972, the U.S. Department of Justice has conducted a National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) to determine the frequency of certain crimes. One category is interracial crimes. Its most recent publication (1997), "Criminal Victimization in the U.S.," reports on data collected in 1994. In that year, there were about 1,700,000 interracial crimes, of which 1,276,030 involved whites and blacks. In 90 percent of the cases, a white was the victim and a black was the perpetrator, while in 10 percent of the cases it was the reverse.

Another finding of the NCVS report is that of the 2,025,464 violent crimes committed by blacks in 1994, 1,140,670 were against whites - that's slightly over 56 percent. Whites committed 5,114,692 violent crimes; 135,360, or 2.6 percent were against blacks.

In 1997, there were 2,336 whites charged with anti-black crimes and 718 blacks charged with anti-white crimes, so-called hate crimes. Although the absolute number of white offenders was larger, the black rate per 100,000 of the population was greater, making blacks twice as likely to commit hate crimes."

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=21982

** "If you want to argue one ethnic group is more problematic, use aggregate statistics rather than singled out anecdotes. The former appeals to logic, the latter to emotion." **

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for hard stats, but it's the emotional appeal of the individual case that drives the interest and creates perceptions. The press, by basically ignoring cases of black-on-white violence, change the perception of who the victims really are. In every damn story on, say, Trayvon Martin, they could note the stats, but many people still wouldn't grasp that black-on-white violence is far higher than the reverse.

I read somewhere not long ago that 5/6th of all cases of interracial violence are committed by blacks. Not sure if it's true, but it seems likely. If you polled Americans on their perceptions, however, they wouldn't come close to guessing it was that high. That's why blacks end up getting more political sympathy than they deserve, especially in SWPL states like Vermont where "tolerant," liberal whites don't have to deal with them.

The comments to this entry are closed.