« Romney pulling away | Main | Why blacks vote for Obama »

October 20, 2012

Comments

She's beautiful but doesn't look human. Are those her real eyes?

There's also a "WeeklyImogen" Youtube channel.

Not creepy at all, no sir.

"There's also a "WeeklyImogen" Youtube channel.

Not creepy at all, no sir.

Posted by: IHTG | October 20, 2012 at 05:15 PM"
---------------------------------
"Creepy" is a code word for any White male sexuality that feminists and liberals oppose.

That's why they never refer to homosexuality as "creepy".

I'm sorry, HS..but I don't see it. "Hauntingly beautiful"? Really. More like your above average Londoner, and in true English fashion she'll age quite badly. If these seems overly cruel, it was not my intention. There's just no..umm..."rise"...happening.

"She’s hauntingly beautiful, but it’s hard to describe why. Is it the large eyes? The pale skin? "

Oh, that is easy. She has the facial proportions of a child. People have an extreme preference for these proportions. (probably adaptive, the preference that is. People who didn't kill their kids left more kids.) And of course, she is beautiful. But lengthen that face to more more mature proportions and woof.

Rhianna has the same unusually short lower face like a child. It is what makes her cute.

"JOHNSTON and FRANKLIN [1993] found that the most attractive versions of adult women’s faces were those having pro- portions typical of 11-14 year-old girls." http://www.anthro.amu.edu.pl/pdf/paar/vol070/05kosci.pdf

Imogen is ugly and too young for you HS

""Creepy" is a code word for any White male sexuality that feminists and liberals oppose."

Yeah but if I called it "beta" that would probably piss you off too

I don't know. She is OK but I don't find her beautiful. IMO, this similarly narcissistic and self-promoting girl is both prettier and more attractive:

http://www.youtube.com/user/madandcrazychild/featured
http://clickflashwhirr.me/

I also look like a child with cat-like eyes and a symmetrical face, but I straight black hair and brown eyes. I am also skinny (and short) too.

I look like the girl in the Numb music video, but with less mature face and shorter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXYiU_JCYtU


But in conversations, I tend to have a vacuous visage since I do not look at people's faces when I am in a conversation since I prefer to stare at something else. Also, I act quite like a child too since I be excited at times and have an immature demeanor since I tend to omit pleasantries (but I do not act boorish) . Socially, I am incapable of engaging in "small talk" as I am not interested in normal adult subjects, such as personal finance, workplace issues, interpersonal relationships, popular culture (besides baseball), and beauty products and techniques; but I can go on monologues on abstract scientific, political, and philosophic issues.

Hairless. I am 100% certain. God damn it.

Voluptuous? Does that word have a different meaning than what I'm thinking?

The reasons she is so attractive are simple: her appearance has everything going for it.

Her face is symmetrical and free of blemishes. Her face is also highly feminized (large eyes, full lips, gracile jaw and brow). Her features also conform very well with the Caucasian average; I'd wager the proportions of her face conforms to the golden ratio: http://facethis.blogspot.com/2012/01/perfect-face-golden-ratio-beauty.html

Wilkinson/Imogen seems like Tarantino/Thurmann 2.0

"Not creepy at all, no sir."

Didn't she create it herself? She must want the whole world to watch it!

First Meghan McCain, now this. I could understand the Meghan McCain bit (what right-wing politically oriented young man wouldn't have fantasies about a right-wing attainably-chunky young woman--she'd probably be an easy pickup if her dad weren't a senator), but an unknown Internet person?

We all know Jewish women are a pain in the butt, but this is ridiculous.

One thing I noticed from the videos is that there is something archaic about her voice. While I'm scarcely an expert on British accents, Imogen sounds more like a character from a 1940's British movie than a modern person.

Nothing about her is unattractive. As others have pointed out, she has feminine features and large eyes. But she's a lot less attractive in the youtube video.

A lot of what makes the photos beautiful is not her actual beauty but the photography, and she's probably good at strike-a-pose.

Also a lot of those photos look like a decent make up artist was involved.

Reminds me of Christina Ricci. This was my favourite pic.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/peopleofplatt/6881586552/in/set-72157624572361792/lightbox/

She's ugly. If a girl like that would try to ask me out or even offered to do a blowjob for me, I would run so fast until I would stop in another continent. She's creepy and ugly. Beautiful are woman like this:

http://www.wprost.pl/G/elements_gallery/0_1320417100.jpg

http://s286.photobucket.com/albums/ll91/freshtilldeathhsonn/?action=view&current=Zoe-1.jpg

This one has awkward pose, but face it just lovely:
http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/blonde-scene-girl-emo-and-scene-hairstyles-11148248-2066-2560.jpg

Or this one:
http://www.scenicreflections.com/ithumbs/Blonde_Girls_Wallpaper_JxHy.jpg

or finally, this one:
http://cdn1.images.videobash.com/photos/000/000/972/972.jpg

@ szopen

Your extreme standards have been shaped by a lifetime of porn.

Conq said: "Your extreme standards have been shaped by a lifetime of porn."

szopen's comment above is the spergiest thing I've read in months (on a blog that's basically a magnet for spergey comments).

But guys, seriously, she (imogen) IS ugly. I don't understand why my standards are "extreme". I presented girls, which are in my opinion "hauntingly beautiful" in contrast to Imogen, and there are plenty of girls walking on streets of my home town every day (here in Poland, that is).

Really Imogen looks on some photos really, really creepy.

@ szope,

Agree to disagree.

The comments to this entry are closed.