Randomly surfing the web, I found this collection of Imogen photos.
Imogen is a 20-year-old music student from Kent England. She claims to have had a crush on Sean Connery, "a beautiful beautiful man," when she was younger. She’s hauntingly beautiful, but it’s hard to describe why. Is it the large eyes? The pale skin? Her voluptuousness (at least slightly more so than the typical commercial model or Hollywood starlet)?
I couldn’t find out much about the photographer, Mark Wilkinson, other than the little he wrote about himself in his self-published photo book. Based on the fact that he received an Olympus Trip camera for his 12th birthday, that places him between the ages of 40 and 57, but more likely closer to 57 than 40 because although the Trip was manufactured until 1984, it was an obsolete camera by then. Mark is not related to Imogen and he’s not a professional photographer. For equipment, he mostly uses a Canon Rebel and the 50mm f/1.8 lens which sells for under $100. I don’t think that lens produces especially attractive bokeh, but I guess you don’t need good bokeh when you have a beautiful model. Mark probably doesn't have a very high-paying job, otherwise he'd most likely indulge his hobby with a more expensive lens purchase.
She's beautiful but doesn't look human. Are those her real eyes?
Posted by: The Legendary Linda | October 20, 2012 at 05:08 PM
There's also a "WeeklyImogen" Youtube channel.
Not creepy at all, no sir.
Posted by: IHTG | October 20, 2012 at 05:15 PM
"There's also a "WeeklyImogen" Youtube channel.
Not creepy at all, no sir.
Posted by: IHTG | October 20, 2012 at 05:15 PM"
---------------------------------
"Creepy" is a code word for any White male sexuality that feminists and liberals oppose.
That's why they never refer to homosexuality as "creepy".
Posted by: Rifleman | October 20, 2012 at 05:33 PM
I'm sorry, HS..but I don't see it. "Hauntingly beautiful"? Really. More like your above average Londoner, and in true English fashion she'll age quite badly. If these seems overly cruel, it was not my intention. There's just no..umm..."rise"...happening.
Posted by: James McKeane | October 20, 2012 at 06:06 PM
"She’s hauntingly beautiful, but it’s hard to describe why. Is it the large eyes? The pale skin? "
Oh, that is easy. She has the facial proportions of a child. People have an extreme preference for these proportions. (probably adaptive, the preference that is. People who didn't kill their kids left more kids.) And of course, she is beautiful. But lengthen that face to more more mature proportions and woof.
Rhianna has the same unusually short lower face like a child. It is what makes her cute.
"JOHNSTON and FRANKLIN [1993] found that the most attractive versions of adult women’s faces were those having pro- portions typical of 11-14 year-old girls." http://www.anthro.amu.edu.pl/pdf/paar/vol070/05kosci.pdf
Posted by: not too late | October 20, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Imogen is ugly and too young for you HS
Posted by: Nicolai Yezhov | October 20, 2012 at 07:38 PM
""Creepy" is a code word for any White male sexuality that feminists and liberals oppose."
Yeah but if I called it "beta" that would probably piss you off too
Posted by: IHTG | October 20, 2012 at 07:54 PM
I don't know. She is OK but I don't find her beautiful. IMO, this similarly narcissistic and self-promoting girl is both prettier and more attractive:
http://www.youtube.com/user/madandcrazychild/featured
http://clickflashwhirr.me/
Posted by: Nanonymous | October 20, 2012 at 08:20 PM
I also look like a child with cat-like eyes and a symmetrical face, but I straight black hair and brown eyes. I am also skinny (and short) too.
I look like the girl in the Numb music video, but with less mature face and shorter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXYiU_JCYtU
But in conversations, I tend to have a vacuous visage since I do not look at people's faces when I am in a conversation since I prefer to stare at something else. Also, I act quite like a child too since I be excited at times and have an immature demeanor since I tend to omit pleasantries (but I do not act boorish) . Socially, I am incapable of engaging in "small talk" as I am not interested in normal adult subjects, such as personal finance, workplace issues, interpersonal relationships, popular culture (besides baseball), and beauty products and techniques; but I can go on monologues on abstract scientific, political, and philosophic issues.
Posted by: Black_Rose | October 20, 2012 at 09:03 PM
Hairless. I am 100% certain. God damn it.
Posted by: Peter | October 20, 2012 at 09:34 PM
Voluptuous? Does that word have a different meaning than what I'm thinking?
The reasons she is so attractive are simple: her appearance has everything going for it.
Her face is symmetrical and free of blemishes. Her face is also highly feminized (large eyes, full lips, gracile jaw and brow). Her features also conform very well with the Caucasian average; I'd wager the proportions of her face conforms to the golden ratio: http://facethis.blogspot.com/2012/01/perfect-face-golden-ratio-beauty.html
Posted by: JayMan | October 20, 2012 at 10:37 PM
Wilkinson/Imogen seems like Tarantino/Thurmann 2.0
Posted by: sestamibi | October 21, 2012 at 01:06 AM
"Not creepy at all, no sir."
Didn't she create it herself? She must want the whole world to watch it!
Posted by: JP | October 21, 2012 at 08:54 AM
First Meghan McCain, now this. I could understand the Meghan McCain bit (what right-wing politically oriented young man wouldn't have fantasies about a right-wing attainably-chunky young woman--she'd probably be an easy pickup if her dad weren't a senator), but an unknown Internet person?
We all know Jewish women are a pain in the butt, but this is ridiculous.
Posted by: SFG | October 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM
One thing I noticed from the videos is that there is something archaic about her voice. While I'm scarcely an expert on British accents, Imogen sounds more like a character from a 1940's British movie than a modern person.
Posted by: Peter | October 21, 2012 at 11:37 AM
Nothing about her is unattractive. As others have pointed out, she has feminine features and large eyes. But she's a lot less attractive in the youtube video.
A lot of what makes the photos beautiful is not her actual beauty but the photography, and she's probably good at strike-a-pose.
Posted by: Insight | October 21, 2012 at 01:47 PM
Also a lot of those photos look like a decent make up artist was involved.
Posted by: Insight | October 21, 2012 at 03:36 PM
Reminds me of Christina Ricci. This was my favourite pic.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peopleofplatt/6881586552/in/set-72157624572361792/lightbox/
Posted by: Kiwiguy | October 22, 2012 at 04:01 AM
She's ugly. If a girl like that would try to ask me out or even offered to do a blowjob for me, I would run so fast until I would stop in another continent. She's creepy and ugly. Beautiful are woman like this:
http://www.wprost.pl/G/elements_gallery/0_1320417100.jpg
http://s286.photobucket.com/albums/ll91/freshtilldeathhsonn/?action=view¤t=Zoe-1.jpg
This one has awkward pose, but face it just lovely:
http://images2.fanpop.com/image/photos/11100000/blonde-scene-girl-emo-and-scene-hairstyles-11148248-2066-2560.jpg
Or this one:
http://www.scenicreflections.com/ithumbs/Blonde_Girls_Wallpaper_JxHy.jpg
or finally, this one:
http://cdn1.images.videobash.com/photos/000/000/972/972.jpg
Posted by: szopen | October 22, 2012 at 08:32 AM
@ szopen
Your extreme standards have been shaped by a lifetime of porn.
Posted by: Conquistador | October 22, 2012 at 02:14 PM
Conq said: "Your extreme standards have been shaped by a lifetime of porn."
szopen's comment above is the spergiest thing I've read in months (on a blog that's basically a magnet for spergey comments).
Posted by: Ian | October 22, 2012 at 03:53 PM
But guys, seriously, she (imogen) IS ugly. I don't understand why my standards are "extreme". I presented girls, which are in my opinion "hauntingly beautiful" in contrast to Imogen, and there are plenty of girls walking on streets of my home town every day (here in Poland, that is).
Really Imogen looks on some photos really, really creepy.
Posted by: szopen | October 23, 2012 at 06:12 AM
@ szope,
Agree to disagree.
Posted by: Kiwiguy | October 25, 2012 at 07:48 PM