Back in 2008 I said that there weren’t going to be any riots?
But maybe, that’s no longer the case on 2012. Infowars continues to report that Twitter is jumping with tweets from people (mostly black people) threatening to riot if Obama loses.
I need to remind readers that there haven’t been any good riots in this country since the Rodney King trial more than 20 years ago.
Siggie you should avoid the subway on election night if Obama loses.
Posted by: Camlost | October 17, 2012 at 03:32 PM
Not by your Rodney King standard. There'll probs be some low-scale stuff that's hard to differentiate from standard wildings.
Hilarious French Socialist President (this blog's kind of leader) wants to outlaw homework!
"That still leaves the homework abolition as a downside. Hollande, however, defends it not in terms of student learning but as a way to equal the playing field for all students. Poor children, he argues, are less likely to get parental aid for homework, and so requiring homework can widen the achievement gap."
Unfair! Unfair! Unfair! It's the mating call of the liberal.
[HS: I don't think that elementary school children need homework.]
Posted by: Secret of NAM | October 17, 2012 at 03:36 PM
If Romney wins by a pretty solid margin there probably won't be much trouble. If it's tight, there will be accusations that the election was "stolen," and then there could be trouble.
I still think it's quite possible Romney wins the national popular vote, but loses in the Electoral College and we get 4 more years of Obama. That will be very interesting, because we've had minority presidents before, but unless I am mistaken, those have all be first-termers, e.g. George W. Bush. I don't think an incumbent has ever lost the popular vote but managed to stay in office.
Presuming all this, plus at least one house of Congress still controlled by the GOP, I don't see how Obama governs, unless he intends to rule by executive order and recess appointments. Which then means impeachment becomes a distinct possibility.
Posted by: Sgt. Joe Friday | October 17, 2012 at 03:40 PM
one thing every beat cop will tell you about impulsive criminal types: they are fuckin lazy and won't venture too far from where ever they crash at night, or from the drug dealer's den. expect most rioting to occur, if it does, within the thugs' own hoods, with a minority of them having the foresight to commute or bike to wealthier neighborhoods where rioting would be more profitable and the frightened prey more emotionally gratifying for them.
in this way, criminals are kind of like house cats. they can move with explosive velocity when prey is near, but most of the time they loll about sleeping and licking themselves, content to watch life pass them by.
Posted by: CH | October 17, 2012 at 04:06 PM
Off topic but two UC Berkeley law school students have been charged with animal cruelty after beheading a rare bird from a Las Vegas hotel exhibit. What class would they fall under now?
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Dean-aghast-at-Vegas-bird-beheading-3950475.php
Posted by: Conquistador | October 17, 2012 at 04:31 PM
First, it's not possible to know the race of someone in twitter.
If there are riots, they'll be the usual destruction of the neighborhoods the rioters live in. Well, unless there's resistance (http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2011/01/los-angeles-times-recently-ran-story.html).
Posted by: J1 | October 17, 2012 at 04:48 PM
That link evidently has to be pasted in rather than clicked.
Posted by: J1 | October 17, 2012 at 04:50 PM
[HS: I don't think that elementary school children need homework.]
Then you probably agree with Hollande that it should be illegal to assign it. So what if some high-achieving young nerd likes academics, right?
Posted by: Secret of NAM | October 17, 2012 at 05:01 PM
I don't think there will be much rioting. For one thing, a large percentage of blacks don't vote at all. The ones who do care about politics tend to be better educated and well-behaved.
Second, blacks have been very disappointed in Obama because they feel he hasn't pandered to them enough while in the white house. Many blacks don't even plan on voting this year because they're that disappointed.
So I don't think they'll really care that much if Obama loses. If anything, it will probably make them happy because it will confirm their belief that the whole world is incurably racis' against blacks.
Posted by: AE | October 17, 2012 at 05:57 PM
My prediction: no riots, no matter what happens with the election.
Posted by: Peter | October 17, 2012 at 05:59 PM
On a wholly different note, for all the claims that Asians are uncreative and conformist, at least we know that they are intelligent and don't get taken in by religious superstition, right?
http://gothamist.com/2012/10/17/use_of_duct_tape_to_cure_mental_ill.php
Posted by: Peter | October 17, 2012 at 06:24 PM
Alrighty then, we can't let the blacks hold America hostage with their threats of political violence. Obama MUST be defeated! If he is re-elected, then the terrorists will have won!
Posted by: JP | October 17, 2012 at 07:37 PM
The radical "black" collective can riot with any result, WIN, LOSE or DRAW.
In fact, there is just as much reason to believe that they will riot in victory as there is to believe that they would riot in defeat.
Posted by: thordaddy | October 17, 2012 at 07:49 PM
@J1 ... it absolutely IS possible to know someone's race on Twitter if they have a profile picture posted. Plus, there are give-aways like they use the word 'nigga' and 'ima' (instead of 'I'm going to).
Posted by: Joe | October 17, 2012 at 07:59 PM
"Will there be riots if Obama loses election?"
So, Siggie, are you up to blogging the election returns live from Harlem so you can update us on the local's Romney victory festivities? Or maybe you could blog from Newark.
I suggest bringing a sawed off shotgun in case you feel a sudden urge to rob a malt liquor store. Or five.
Think of the potential celebrity you could gain...
Posted by: The Undiscovered Jew | October 17, 2012 at 08:17 PM
"Second, blacks have been very disappointed in Obama because they feel he hasn't pandered to them enough while in the white house. Many blacks don't even plan on voting this year because they're that disappointed".
People were predicting that Blacks would boss others around when Obama was elected to office, reminiscent of David Dinkins being the 1st AA mayor of NYC. During his reign, Blacks in the city believed they could do whatever they want and get away with murder.
[HS: Lemrick Nelson DID get away with murder:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemrick_Nelson ]]
Posted by: Just Speculating | October 17, 2012 at 08:27 PM
I think there will be some rioting. Probably LA and Detroit.
If its 269/269 decided by the House I predict the Times riots.
Posted by: Turambar | October 17, 2012 at 08:36 PM
Technology have pacified 'them' enough that they'll have little motivation to riot. They'd rather play Farmville on their smartphone or take and upload pictures on their facebook page. They might leave a status update on their facebook page stating how messed up it was that Obama lost and how the election was rigged.
Posted by: Drole Prole | October 17, 2012 at 09:39 PM
"People were predicting that Blacks would boss others around when Obama was elected to office..."
----
Sounds about right. I recently read a diatribe in The Atlantic written by a black man who complained that Obama doesn't lecture white people about race enough. Then the author ranted on about how America can't handle a "real black president."
I think that blacks were hoping that Obama would transform into Al Sharpton after winning the election and that the Dems would start ramming a bunch of racially targeted redistributive policies down the public's throat. It is kind of interesting to think that Obama has unanimous support from blacks, yet he's done the least for them of any group thus far. The only group Obama seems to have stuck his neck out for is the gays.
Posted by: AE | October 17, 2012 at 11:51 PM
"it absolutely IS possible to know someone's race on Twitter if they have a profile picture posted"
That assumes the profile picture is of the account owner. Again, not possible to know.
"there are give-aways like they use the word 'nigga' and 'ima' (instead of 'I'm going to)"
The fact that a poster uses ghetto syntax and language means they know ghetto syntax and language.
Posted by: J1 | October 18, 2012 at 01:03 AM
blacks are just running their mouths, as they do
Posted by: anonymous | October 18, 2012 at 01:48 AM
Btw, Sigma, you were right: the Benghazi disaster has been a dragged down Obama's poll #s.
Excessive gloating and ego-boosting to commence in five, four, three...
Posted by: The Undiscovered Jew | October 18, 2012 at 02:18 AM
A better question is which country will whites invade and destroy if Mitt wins?
Posted by: You guys are pathetic | October 18, 2012 at 06:48 AM
@You guys,
Tell your teleprompter jesus to quit fucking with Libya and Egypt, and stay the hell out of Syria.
Posted by: Duhhhh | October 18, 2012 at 09:16 AM
"which country will whites invade and destroy if Mitt wins?"
That's old-think. The new way to destroy countries is not by invading them but by turning loose the killer drones. The Nobel Peace Prize winner who has started the most wars, and unleashed the most targeted killings, has shown us the way!
Posted by: JP | October 18, 2012 at 09:18 AM
...and quit bombing civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, etc. And to quit arming the insurgency in our neighbor and ally Mexico.
That dumb puppet sure does love killing people, doesn't he?
Posted by: Duhhhh | October 18, 2012 at 09:20 AM
"A better question is which country will whites invade and destroy if Mitt wins?"
-----
Trivia: blacks have served in every US war since the American Revolution. They even helped the US settle the West. Nowadays, our armed forces are a melting pot of different races. So it's inaccurate to make the implication that only "whites" invade and destroy other countries.
Posted by: AE | October 18, 2012 at 09:59 AM
Siggie, even if riots do occur across the entire US you are perfectly safe since NYC is a gun-free zone.
Posted by: Camlost | October 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM
It will be funny if they only riot in the states that Obama carries.
Posted by: not too late | October 18, 2012 at 12:51 PM
"law school students have been charged with"
The article itself says they haven't been charged. Idiot.
Posted by: helene edwards | October 18, 2012 at 08:23 PM
@ helene edwards
Are you moody due to your period? Do menopausal hags like you still have periods? They've been booked, witnesses saw them, surveillance footage exists, their pictures are everywhere, and they're rich which means a prosecutor can brag to voters that nobody is above the law. What do you think will happen?
Posted by: Conquistador | October 18, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Methinks there will be no riots, regardless of the result.
@Secret of NAM: Regarding the homework issue, I recently blogged about it; mayhap the post will be of interest to you:
http://concourseexp.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/homework/
Posted by: Nelson | October 18, 2012 at 11:02 PM
Toure will riot on MSNBC or whatever crap stupid cable network he is on.
Other than that, not so much. Blacks have mastered the art of sullen non-compliance, more than rioting. They really don't riot often.
Obamessiah losing isn't in their lights a riotable offense, but it will be a cause of a major amount of "Sheeit!" and "Daaayuum" patented black sullenness. Look forward to many years of even more sour black rage.
But I wonder whether or not blacks are so over, so 20th century. The one and only good thing about the Hispanic invasion is that they are now the dominant minority group. I think it is going to take some time for the realities of that to set in amongst whites and blacks.
Posted by: jay | October 19, 2012 at 12:26 PM
"Btw, Sigma, you were right: the Benghazi disaster has been a dragged down Obama's poll #s."
Actually it was Obama's poor debate performance that dragged down his poll numbers, or more accurately, boosted Romney's.
Posted by: The Legendary Linda | October 19, 2012 at 06:56 PM
"It is kind of interesting to think that Obama has unanimous support from blacks, yet he's done the least for them of any group thus far."
What about Obamacare?
Posted by: The Legendary Linda | October 19, 2012 at 07:00 PM
"It is kind of interesting to think that Obama has unanimous support from blacks, yet he's done the least for them of any group thus far."
"What about Obamacare?"
How does Obamacare help blacks?
Posted by: not too late | October 19, 2012 at 10:11 PM
If Obama lose gunna be big troubl for whitey. Every bro and sister that gets yams gunna fight for what theres. everyone know romnee gunna take away our Soch Securty and foodstamps an such. If he do it gunna be hell for whitey as we gunna take what we wants an if whitey in the way its by by whitey. Same for jews and koreuns to! they in the way they dun! vote for obama and do it all you can do.
Posted by: Titus Greenwood | October 20, 2012 at 04:21 PM